Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209504›Full record

ArticleAlpha psychiatry2025

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning‑Based Predictive Model for Assessing the Risk of Comorbid Depression in Patients With Asthma.

Qiu Nie, Xu Deng, Xin Chen, Tianwei Lai, Wen Li, Yutong Liu, Jingyi Lin, Qingsong Ren, Jingjing Liu, Yinxu Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qiu NieDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0611-6115
Xu DengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4093-1391
Xin ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6259-2289
Tianwei LaiDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy Center, Digestive Disease Center, Suining Central Hospital, 629000 Suining, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3808-8445
Wen LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7939-7935
Yutong LiuCollege of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8562-9361
Jingyi LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9747-6437
Qingsong RenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8672-4238
Jingjing LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1885-2883
Yinxu WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2267-9915
Yulei XieDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 637000 Nanchong, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-5804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict the risk of comorbid depression in asthma patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 2464 asthma patients with comorbid depression using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Eight machine learning algorithms, namely Decision Tree (DT), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Light Gradient Booster Machine (LGBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were trained using 5-fold cross-validation methodology. Model performance was evaluated through various metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Interpretation was conducted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, highlighting feature importance. Results: The training set comprised 1724 participants, while the validation set included 740 participants, with a depression prevalence of 14.45%. Significant predictors identified included hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, sleep questionnaire (SLQ) scores, smoking status, Poverty Index Ratio (PIR), and educational level. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance compared with alternative machine learning (ML) algorithms, achieving an AUC of 0.750, an accuracy of 69.1%, a sensitivity of 68.2%, a specificity of 73.8%, and an F1 score of 79%. The SHAP method identified SLQ, PIR, and education level as the primary decision factors influencing the ML model's predictions. Conclusion: The XGBoost model effectively predicts the risk of depression in asthma patients, serving as a valuable reference for early clinical identification and intervention.

Indexed as

asthmadepressionmachine learningpredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41209504
PMCPMC12593838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.