ArticlePain reports2025
Bayesian attenuation of offset analgesia filters out random disturbances in noxious stimuli.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Offset analgesia (OA), an endogenous pain inhibition after an abrupt decrease in noxious stimulation, provides a paradigm to study dynamic interaction between ascending and descending pain pathways. Previous studies assumed that this interaction follows deterministic dynamics. In contrast, a recent perspective views pain perception as a Bayesian process: a statistically optimal updating of pain predictions based on noisy sensory input. Objectives: We examined whether OA is driven by a deterministic interaction between ascending and descending pathways, or by a Bayesian process in which the brain updates pain perception by combining expectations with incoming signals. Methods: We modified the conventional OA paradigm by adding high-frequency noise after an abrupt decrease in noxious stimulation and measured pain intensity responses in healthy participants. Pain reports were analyzed using 2 computational models: a deterministic dynamic equation model and a recursive Bayesian integration model. Hypothesis testing was conducted using model selection. Results: Offset analgesia was observed after reduction of noxious stimuli, but pain was disinhibited by high-frequency disturbances. The deterministic model predicted unbounded oscillations depending on disturbance sequence, whereas the Bayesian model predicted gradual OA attenuation by filtering out noise. Model selection favored the Bayesian model. Conclusion: The brain dissociates noise from primary signals, achieving stable pain perception even in the presence of noisy inputs. Thus, OA reflects a stochastic integration between prediction and observation, with noise magnitude modulating pain intensity. Clinically, these results suggest that enhancing endogenous pain inhibition for chronic pain may be achieved through interventions targeting noise recognition mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.