Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209470›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Ultrasonographic features of epididymitis in dogs: a case series.

Stefano Spada, Marco Russo, Sebastian P Arlt, Bianca L Frehner, Gaia Pagani, Joana Rodrigues Carvalho, Hélène Jainek, Nicola Ambrosio, Daniela De Felice, Johannes Herbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefano SpadaClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Marco RussoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Sebastian P ArltClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Bianca L FrehnerClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gaia PaganiClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Joana Rodrigues CarvalhoClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hélène JainekClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nicola AmbrosioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Daniela De FeliceDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Johannes HerbelClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Epididymitis in dogs is an underreported but clinically relevant condition, often associated with scrotal pain, systemic inflammation, and infertility. Diagnosis commonly relies on clinical and ultrasonographic findings, even though information concerning the latter are poorly documented. This report aims to describe the ultrasonographic features of epididymitis in a series of clinical canine cases, including clinical and laboratory findings. Materials and methods: Clinical cases of dogs affected by epididymitis were retrospectively included. Clinical signs, andrological findings, ultrasonographic abnormalities of the epididymis and testicles, blood analysis and, where available, cytological or histopathological data were recorded. Ultrasonographic features evaluated included epididymal size, capsular integrity, echotexture, vascularization, presence of mineralization and scrotal effusion. Results: Fourteen dogs with epididymitis were included, and the condition was unilateral in 11 dogs (eight left-sided) and bilateral in three. On B-mode ultrasound the epididymal tail was the most frequently affected portion. Other frequent findings included epididymal enlargement, capsular irregularity, and inhomogeneous echotexture. Mineralization, hypoechoic cavities, and peri-epididymal oedema were observed, but not present in all cases. Concurrent testicular and urogenital abnormalities, along with leucocytosis and neutrophilic left shift, were common in acute cases. Conclusion: This is the first case series describing ultrasonographic patterns of epididymitis in dogs. Early recognition via ultrasound may support targeted treatment and fertility preservation.

Indexed as

dogepididymitisinflammationtesticlesultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41209470
PMCPMC12591964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.