ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Metabolomics in neonatal sepsis: A critical appraisal of current evidence.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers for Necrotising Enterocolitis-Are We There Yet?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Glutamate-Glutamine Axis in Pediatric Septic Shock: Immunometabolic Mechanisms, Biomarker Potential, and Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- HIF-1α Promotes Macrophage Extracellular Trap Formation and Exacerbates Acute Lung Injury in Neonatal Sepsis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide; however, timely and accurate diagnosis continues to present a significant clinical challenge. Current diagnostic methods, including blood culture and inflammatory markers, are limited by delayed turnaround times and a lack of specificity, often leading to overtreatment or missed opportunities for intervention. In recent years, metabolomics has emerged as a promising approach for discovering novel biomarkers that reflect the systemic metabolic disruptions characteristic of neonatal sepsis. This systematic review summarizes the existing evidence on changes in metabolites and metabolite classes associated with neonatal sepsis, with a focus on their potential as biomarkers. Eleven eligible studies were reviewed, covering various analytical techniques and biofluids, including serum, urine, and stool. Although a wide range of metabolite alterations was observed, particular attention was given to amino acid metabolism, energy substrates, and lipid derivatives. The findings emphasize both the potential and current limitations of metabolomics-based biomarker discovery in this area. The review identifies important gaps in the literature, including diverse study designs, small sample sizes, and inconsistent reporting, highlighting the need for rigorous, standardized research. The importance and clinical potential of metabolomics in neonatal sepsis are thoroughly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.