ArticleAJPM focus2025
Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: Demographic and Socioeconomic Influences.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Willingness to receive lung cancer screening when engaged in community-based locations.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Disparities in Lung Cancer Health Outcomes and Access to Lung Cancer Screening Between Rural and Urban Areas in the U.S.Cancers · 2026Review
- Maintaining momentum: the history and future of lung cancer disparities in the United States.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the U.S. Low-dose computed tomography is recommended for lung cancer screening in high-risk patients. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force updated its recommendation for lung cancer screening in March 2021 to expand eligibility. This study aims to assess lung cancer screening rates and identify factors influencing lung cancer screening uptake under the new recommendations in Southeast Michigan. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on lung cancer screening-eligible patients from April 2021 to December 2023. Patients' demographics, clinical, and socioeconomic factors were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with lung cancer screening uptake. Results: Of the 42,769 eligible patients, only 9,249 (22%) completed lung cancer screening at least once during the study period. Lung cancer screening rate increased from <10% in the first year to nearly 35% by the end of the study period. Higher uptake was observed in patients aged 60-80 years, females, former smokers, and Asian patients. Lung cancer screening was significantly less likely among patients of Middle Eastern or Arab ethnicity, patients of Black race, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those who lived in deprived ZIP codes. Conclusions: Since U.S. Preventive Services Task Force expanded eligibility criteria, lung cancer screening rates remain suboptimal, with disparities across demographic and socioeconomic groups. Tailored, equitable interventions are critical to increasing screening uptake among high-risk and minority populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.