ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2025
Synaptic facilitation and learning of multiplexed neural signals.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In this work, we introduce a novel approach to one of the historically fundamental questions in neural networks: how to encode information? More particularly, we look at temporal coding in spiking networks, where the timing of a spike as opposed to the frequency, determines the information content. In contrast to previous temporal-coding schemes, which rely on the statistical properties of populations of neurons and connections, we employ a novel synaptic plasticity mechanism that allows the timing to be learnt at the single-synapse level. Methods: Using a formal basis from information theory, we show how a phase-coded spike train (relative to some 'reference' phase) can, in fact, multiplex multiple different information signals onto the same spike train, significantly improving overall information capacity. We furthermore derive limits on the channel capacity in the phase-coded spiking case, and show that the learning rule also has a continuous derivative in the input-output relation, making it potentially amenable to classical learning rules from artificial neural networks such as backpropagation. Results: Using a simple demonstration network, we show the multiplexing of different signals onto the same connection, and demonstrate that different synapses indeed can adapt using this learning rule, to specialise to different interspike intervals (i.e., phase relationships). The overall approach allows for denser encoding, and thus energy efficiency, in neural networks for complex tasks, allowing smaller and more compact networks to achieve combinations of tasks which traditionally would have required high-dimensional embeddings. Discussion: Although carried out as a study in computational spiking neural networks, the results may have insights for functional neuroscience, and suggest links to mechanisms that have been shown from neuroscientific studies to support temporal coding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to solve one of the outstanding problems in spiking neural networks: to demonstrate that distinct temporal codings can be distinguished through synaptic learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.