ArticleScientifica2025
Photosynthetic Traits, Growth, and Yield of Cassava Plantlets From Different Sources and Cultivars.
Article in Scientifica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cassava cultivation faces increasing challenges from diseases, particularly cassava mosaic virus. Efficient propagation systems are essential for producing disease-free plants and sustaining production. However, information on the agronomic, physiological, growth traits, and yield of cassava plantlets produced through rapid propagation remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the photosynthetic and agronomic traits, as well as the growth and yield, of cassava plantlets derived from an aeroponic system under both pot and field conditions, using a 3 × 4 factorial arrangement in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Three cassava varieties-Kasetsart 50 (KU50), Rayong 9 (RY9), and Huay Bong 60 (HB60)-were assigned as Factor A, while four plantlet sources-three derived from aeroponic systems (leaf bud cuttings, mini-cuttings, and normal cuttings) and one from conventional cuttings-were assigned as Factor B. The results indicated that HB60 and RY9 exhibited superior growth, stem diameter, photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration, and higher yields. Notably, RY9 also showed greater plant height and stem diameter, contributing to a higher multiplication rate. Plantlet sources did not significantly affect photosynthetic traits under either pot or field conditions but did increase canopy height, starch yield in the field, and starch content in the pot. Interestingly, the performance of leaf bud cuttings, mini-cuttings, and normal cuttings was comparable to conventional planting methods in terms of photosynthetic traits, yield traits, and harvest index. These findings suggest similarities among cassava cultivars in their responses to different plantlet sources and highlight the potential value of plantlet sources as a consideration for plant propagation programs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.