ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
A review of uphill and downhill running: biomechanics, physiology and modulating factors.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Biomechanical Responses to Level, Uphill, and Downhill Running Segments During an Outdoor Marathon.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Perceived exertion reflects exercise-induced pain rather than psychological characteristics in recreational endurance athletes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graded running imposes distinct biomechanical and physiological demands compared with level running, which influences performance outcomes and injury risk. Uphill running requires great propulsion and energy expenditure, which results in increased oxygen consumption and cardiovascular burden. By contrast, downhill running relies heavily on eccentric muscle contractions, which show an association with great fatigue and a high risk of injury. This review aims to summarize biomechanical and physiological adaptations to uphill and downhill running and evaluate the mechanisms underlying the interaction of modulating factors (footwear, foot strike patterns, individual characteristics, pacing strategies, cadence and running speed) with slope. Based on current evidence, these factors affect mechanical loading, energy cost and neuromuscular responses during uphill and downhill running. Footwear design, especially carbon-fiber plate shoes, can reduce metabolic cost during uphill and downhill running. Forefoot striking reduces peak impact forces compared to rearfoot striking, especially in downhill running, helping to lower impact on the lower limbs. Individual factors, like training level, influence the effectiveness of these factors, with experienced runners adapting better to slopes. Additionally, adjusting cadence can reduce per-step load and energy expenditure during uphill and downhill running. Although considerable progress has been made, further research still necessitates the exploration of graded running in real-world environments, improvement of training methods, clarification of the interactions between various factors and slope and optimization of methods to prevent injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.