ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for acute ischemic stroke in a carotid artery plaque population.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate and timely prediction of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is essential to optimize treatment strategies. However, there are many risk factors closely associated with AIS, and the research methods are varied and incomplete. This study developed a prediction model based on ultrasonic imaging and clinical parameters, and evaluated its clinical application value as a quantitative tool for predicting the risk of AIS and guiding clinical prevention and treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the risk factors associated with AIS. Univariate, multivariate, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were conducted to screen variables, identify relevant independent risk factors, and construct a nomogram prediction model. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess model accuracy, C statistics were used to assess model differentiability, and calibration curves were used to assess clinical consistency. Results: A total of 244 patients were included in the study. Significant variables (P<0.05) identified by the univariate and LASSO regression analyses were included in the multivariate analysis, and five variables, including the plaque area, neovascularization density, white blood cell (WBC) count, waist ratio, and a history of alcohol consumption, were included the prediction model. A column-line prediction model was successfully constructed. The ROC curves of the training set and the test set were 0.738 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.582-0.884] and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.669-0.807), respectively, indicating good accuracy. The C statistic was >0.7, indicating that the ability of the model to identify patients with AIS was relatively good. The calibration curve showed good consistency with the ideal curve, and the degree of fit was good. The P values of the Hosmer and Lemeshow tests of the model were both >0.05, indicating that the calibration degree of the prediction model was good. The probability of AIS predicted by the prediction model was in good agreement with the actual probability. The decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the model had good Clinical practicality. Conclusions: The plaque area, the density of new blood vessels, WBC count, girth ratio, and a history of alcohol consumption were identified as independent risk factors and included in a nomogram prediction model for AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.