ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Artificial intelligence aids doctors in diagnosing necrotizing enterocolitis and predicting surgery using abdominal radiographs: a multicenter study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is challenging to diagnose due to its subtle radiological features on abdominal radiographs (ARs) and considerable variability in interpretation among clinicians, especially those with limited experience, which may delay timely intervention. The study aimed to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) based artificial intelligence (AI) model using ARs to predict NEC and the need for surgical intervention, and to evaluate its ability to assist clinicians in AR interpretation. Methods: We retrospectively collected 738 ARs from 576 preterm infants across three medical centers. The ARs were labeled into three categories: non-NEC, medical-NEC, and surgical-NEC. Data from two centers (set A, n=347; set B, n=130) were randomly split into training and internal testing sets (8:2 ratio), while data from the third center (set C, n=99) served as an external testing set. Six deep learning models [efficientnet, Inception_v3, visual geometry group (VGG), resnet, squeezenet, and densenet] were trained, and the best model was selected. Six clinicians with varying experience interpreted set C ARs, and their accuracy was compared before and after using the best model's AI-assisted visualizations. Results: The Efficientnet-b0 model, trained on the combined dataset of A and B, performed best. On set C, it achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.883, 0.640, and 0.837 for non-NEC, medical-NEC, and surgical-NEC, respectively, outperforming single-center models (P<0.05). With AI assistance, clinicians' diagnostic accuracy improved by 2.0% to 26.2%. Conclusions: The CNN-based AI model effectively distinguished NEC and identified cases requiring surgery. Clinicians' AR interpretation accuracy improved with AI assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.