Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209265›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Quantitative metrics of mean apparent propagator magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Xingke Huang, Jiayi Huang, Yingmei Tang, Wei Jiang, Qiongchao Jiang, Minxi Shen, Zehong Yang, Mengzhu Wang, Qin Li, Yeqing Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xingke Huang *Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayi Huang *Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingmei Tang *Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiongchao JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Minxi ShenDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Zehong YangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mengzhu WangMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Guangzhou, China.
Qin LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yeqing LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xu YanMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Guangzhou, China.
Guang YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Ya QiuDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) status using only morphological criteria or conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value is not sufficiently accurate. Mean apparent propagator (MAP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the potential for discriminating metastatic and nonmetastatic ALNs. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MAP-MRI quantitative metrics in discriminating between metastatic and nonmetastatic ALNs in breast cancer patients. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 145 participants (mean age, 49±10 years) with breast cancer from December 2021 to February 2023 who underwent diffusion spectrum imaging and conventional MRI. All participants received ultrasound (US)-guided ALN biopsy or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and were divided into metastatic (n=53) and nonmetastatic (n=92) ALN groups based on pathology. The MAP-MRI metrics derived from diffusion spectrum imaging and the ADC value derived from conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were measured. The MRI morphologic features of all target ALNs were assessed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance. Results: Six diffusion MRI metrics, namely, the MAP_non-Gaussianity (NG), MAP_axial non-Gaussianity (NG Conclusions: The MAP-MRI metric has superior performance to the ADC value and MRI morphologic assessment in identifying metastatic ALN in breast cancer patients for optimizing the diagnostic work-up.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsdiffusion magnetic resonance imaging (diffusion MRI)lymph nodemean apparent propagator (MAP)

Identifiers

PMID41209265
PMCPMC12591763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.