ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Tabular prior-data fitted network in real-world CT radiomics: benign
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models can potentially distinguish between benign and malignant renal tumors on computed tomography (CT). Traditional algorithms necessitate intensive hyperparameter tuning and large datasets for optimization. This study assessed the novel tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN), a pre-trained transformer model for tabular data classification, and compared it with conventional algorithms using real-world CT radiomics datasets. Methods: Two retrospective cohorts were analyzed: datasets A [207 cystic renal masses (CRMs): 92 benign, 115 malignant] and B [92 tumors: 41 renal oncocytomas (ROs), 51 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (CRCCs)]. Radiomic features were extracted from three-phase CT images (unenhanced, corticomedullary, and nephrographic) using PyRadiomics. Seven algorithms [support vector machine (SVM), stochastic gradient descent (SGD), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and TabPFN] were evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation. Evaluation metrics included area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and feature importance. Results: In dataset A, all models achieved high AUCs (training: 0.935-1.000; validation: 0.800-0.946). TabPFN showed top-tier performance, particularly in nephrographic-phase analysis (validation AUC: 0.946). In dataset B, TabPFN demonstrated superior stability (validation AUC: 0.700-0.800), outperforming SVM and KNN while circumventing the convergence failures of SGD. On feature importance analysis, its dynamic weight allocation paralleled that of ensemble models (RF/XGBoost) without explicit hyperparameter optimization. Conclusions: TabPFN demonstrates robust performance in differentiating renal tumors, particularly in small-scale, high-dimensional datasets. Its transformer-based architecture and pre-training on synthetic data eliminate manual parameter tuning, enhancing clinical applicability over conventional ML approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.