Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209261›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Tabular prior-data fitted network in real-world CT radiomics: benign

Tianzhu Liu, Huanjun Wang, Yan Guo, Yongsong Ye, Bei Weng, Xiaodan Li, Jun Chen, Shanghuang Xie, Guimian Zhong, Zhixuan Song and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tianzhu Liu *Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.
Huanjun Wang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yongsong YeDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Bei WengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaodan LiDepartment of Gynaecology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.
Shanghuang XieLab of Molecular Imaging and Medical Intelligence, Department of Radiology, Longgang Central Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Longgang Central Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Guimian ZhongDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhixuan SongClinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China.
Lesheng HuangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models can potentially distinguish between benign and malignant renal tumors on computed tomography (CT). Traditional algorithms necessitate intensive hyperparameter tuning and large datasets for optimization. This study assessed the novel tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN), a pre-trained transformer model for tabular data classification, and compared it with conventional algorithms using real-world CT radiomics datasets. Methods: Two retrospective cohorts were analyzed: datasets A [207 cystic renal masses (CRMs): 92 benign, 115 malignant] and B [92 tumors: 41 renal oncocytomas (ROs), 51 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (CRCCs)]. Radiomic features were extracted from three-phase CT images (unenhanced, corticomedullary, and nephrographic) using PyRadiomics. Seven algorithms [support vector machine (SVM), stochastic gradient descent (SGD), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and TabPFN] were evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation. Evaluation metrics included area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and feature importance. Results: In dataset A, all models achieved high AUCs (training: 0.935-1.000; validation: 0.800-0.946). TabPFN showed top-tier performance, particularly in nephrographic-phase analysis (validation AUC: 0.946). In dataset B, TabPFN demonstrated superior stability (validation AUC: 0.700-0.800), outperforming SVM and KNN while circumventing the convergence failures of SGD. On feature importance analysis, its dynamic weight allocation paralleled that of ensemble models (RF/XGBoost) without explicit hyperparameter optimization. Conclusions: TabPFN demonstrates robust performance in differentiating renal tumors, particularly in small-scale, high-dimensional datasets. Its transformer-based architecture and pre-training on synthetic data eliminate manual parameter tuning, enhancing clinical applicability over conventional ML approaches.

Indexed as

machine learning (ML)real-world evaluationrenal tumorTabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN)

Identifiers

PMID41209261
PMCPMC12591794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.