ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Deep learning-assisted aortic stenosis detection and grading based on multiview versus single-view echocardiography.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in heart and brain ultrasound: the least you need to know.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advances in deep learning (DL) have shown promise in automating echocardiogram interpretation, thereby enhancing accuracy and efficiency in clinical practice. However, a fully automated pipeline for aortic stenosis (AS) analysis remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to develop a DL framework to streamline clinical AS assessment. Methods: A total of 499 AS studies (1,996 echocardiographic view) were selected from 17,436 cases of patients with valvular heart diseases (VHDs) obtained from three hospitals to form training (n=302), validation (n=76), and internal testing (n=121) datasets, while a prospectively collected set of 3,278 consecutive echocardiograms served as a real-world test data set. The DL framework automatically classified echocardiographic views, detected the presence of AS, and employed two algorithms to assess severity: multiview and single-view. Results: The DL model achieved high performance in AS detection in the prospective test dataset, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.942. The correlation between DL-graded metrics and manual measurements was excellent for aortic valve (AV) peak velocity (r=0.94; P<0.001), mean peak gradient (r=0.91; P<0.001), left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) (r=0.81; P<0.001), AV velocity-time integral (VTI) (r=0.94; P<0.001), LVOT VTI (r=0.88; P<0.001), and AV area (r=0.87; P<0.001). Based on these metrics, the AUC of severe AS was the highest at 0.976 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.953-1.0], significantly superior to those for moderate AS (AUC =0.907) and mild AS (AUC =0.874). The two-dimensional parasternal long-axis view method yielded comparable AUCs for all AS severities (AUC: 0.869-0.920). Conclusions: The proposed DL algorithm has the potential to automate and enhance the efficiency of clinical workflows for AS screening and grading in echocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.