ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Automatic diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis by deep learning based on X-ray coronary angiography.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multisource cue fusion-based method for coronary artery stenosis detection in digital subtraction angiography.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- VMamba-QAG-net: a five-stage pipeline for SYNTAX score computation and decision support in interventional cardiology using X-ray angiography.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of global mortality, primarily due to the accumulation of atheromatous plaques in coronary arteries. The current diagnostic standards include X-ray coronary angiography, which evaluates morphological features of the coronary arteries. The primary goal of this modality is to quantify stenosis severity, but variability and complexities in the resultant images make consistent interpretation challenging. This study developed a deep learning-based approach for segmenting and grading vessel stenosis via X-ray coronary angiography. Methods: Based on 383 angiographic images from 168 patients, we developed a dual-output deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically diagnose stenosis. For clinical relevance, we manually annotated stenosis severity into five distinct levels: nonobstructive lesion (1-49%), intermediate lesion (50-70%), severe lesion (71-95%), sub-total occlusion (96-99%), and total occlusion (100%). Results: We built a coronary stenosis segmentation and grading method based on X-ray coronary angiography. The model achieved an average intersection over union (IoU) of 0.92, a Dice score of 0.95, a precision of 0.93, and a sensitivity of 0.96. Conclusions: We introduce an image-based vascular analysis method that localizes and grades stenosis in X-ray coronary angiography. This method can automatically identify clinically critical grades, especially within the 71-100% range. Deep learning methods can potentially facilitate the diagnosis of CAD and patient-centric treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.