ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cross-attention guided multi-modal network for breast ultrasound diagnosis incorporating objective clinical semantics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Habitat imaging based on DCE-MRI for differentiating luminal and non-luminal subtypes of breast cancer: a two-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of deep learning methods within the multi-modal domain of breast cancer research. Integrating multi-modal data for breast cancer prediction can generate richer and more diverse set of information, leading to a greater robustness in prediction outcomes as compared to single-modal approaches. This review comprehensively summarizes the advancements in multi-modal breast cancer research over the past 5 years and critically assesses the related opportunities and challenges, serving as a valuable reference for future studies. The application of deep learning techniques to the processing of multi-modal breast cancer data is discussed in depth, and the latest strategies and potential future directions in this area are examined. Methods: A systematic analysis of studies on deep learning methods for breast cancer diagnosis based on multi-modal data was conducted. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2019 and April 2025. To ensure the representativeness of the included research, studies were evaluated according to three aspects: types of multi-modal data used, the fusion strategies adopted, and their clinical relevance. Key Content and Findings: This review systematically traces the development of deep learning approaches for multi-modal breast cancer data, from foundational to more advanced methodologies. First, the paper categorizes common data types and core tasks related to breast cancer prediction. Subsequently, it classifies multi-modal data fusion strategies into three types-feature-level fusion, decision-level fusion, and hybrid fusion-providing a detailed explanation of the prediction steps for each category and comparing their effectiveness. Finally, the common challenges in multi-modal breast cancer research and insights into potential directions for future research are identified and discussed. Conclusions: At present, although numerous deep learning-based multi-modal studies on breast cancer have been proposed, multi-modal fusion remains in the exploratory stage. Future research should focus on addressing the scarcity of high-quality public datasets, as well as developing more robust network architectures and adaptive fusion strategies to better capture complementary information across modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.