ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Automatic and observable spinal cord compression grading system for lung cancer spinal metastasis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) assessment is a critical step in surgical intervention for lung cancer spinal metastasis. However, clinicians can only assess compression grades through manual observation, which is subjective and inefficient. The metastatic cancer features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices are complex and difficult to identify, and there are no publicly labeled datasets currently. The objective of this study was to develop an automatic and efficient system for assessing spinal cord compression grading based on multi-tissue and feature segmentation. Methods: We constructed a dataset containing 577 lung cancer spinal metastasis MRI slices with multi-tissue semantic segmentation masks and ESCC grading. We then proposed a progressive approach for grading ESCC via segmentation and transfer learning (TL) classification to improve clinical assessment accuracy and efficiency. First, we used an improved encoder-decoder segmentation network with a pyramid pooling module (PPM) on the bottleneck and cross-attention modules on the skip connections to segment the compression-related tissues, such as the spine, spinal cord, and bone tumors. Secondly, we proposed a dual attention network (DAN) with position and channel attention modules, and pre-trained it on ImageNet1000 to improve network performance. Finally, we used the multi-tissue features of the previous segmentation as training data and fine-tuned the DAN via TL to achieve accurate compression grading. Results: The segmentation results achieved an average pixel accuracy of 0.819 and an average intersection over union of 0.711. The classification accuracy reached 0.95, and the classification precision was 0.89. These results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed few-shot feature recognition and classification method in multi-target recognition. Compared to the traditional segmentation and classification models, our model exhibits enhanced performance and effectiveness in grading spinal compression. Conclusions: The spinal cord compression grading in lung cancer spinal metastasis is an important surgical indication. The system developed herein has been verified with an accuracy of 0.95 in compression grading, which will be helpful for orthopedic surgeons to determine reasonable treatment plans for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.