Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209085›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Graph models of brain state in deep anesthesia reveal sink state dynamics of reduced spatiotemporal complexity.

James Barnard Wilsenach, Charlotte M Deane, Gesine Reinert, Katie Warnaby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James Barnard WilsenachAlan Turing Institute, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-9009
Charlotte M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gesine ReinertDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katie WarnabyOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthetisia is an important surgical and explorative tool in the study of consciousness. Much work has been done to connect the deeply anesthetized condition with decreased complexity. However, anesthesia-induced unconsciousness is also a dynamic condition in which functional activity and complexity may fluctuate, being perturbed by internal or external (e.g., noxious) stimuli. We use fMRI data from a cohort undergoing deep propofol anesthesia to investigate resting state dynamics using dynamic brain state models and spatiotemporal network analysis. We focus our analysis on group-level dynamics of brain state temporal complexity, functional activity, connectivity, and spatiotemporal modularization in deep anesthesia and wakefulness. We find that in contrast to dynamics in the wakeful condition, anesthesia dynamics are dominated by a handful of sink states that act as low-complexity attractors to which subjects repeatedly return. On a subject level, our analysis provides tentative evidence that these low-complexity attractor states appear to depend on subject-specific age and anesthesia susceptibility factors. Finally, our spatiotemporal analysis, including a novel spatiotemporal clustering of graphs representing hidden Markov models, suggests that dynamic functional organization in anesthesia can be characterized by mostly unchanging, isolated regional subnetworks that share some similarities with the brain's underlying structural connectivity, as determined from normative tractography data.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaComplexityConsciousnessDynamic brain state modelsHidden Markov modelsSpatiotemporal community detection

Identifiers

PMID41209085
PMCPMC12594487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.