ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to boost adoptive T cell therapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- CCL17-neutralizing and esterase-responsive core-shell microgels for endogenous Tregs recruitment and functional enhancement in myocardial infarction.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Bearing GPC Mutations for Enhanced Tumor Tropism and Strong Anti-Tumor Activity.Viruses · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy 3.0: Breakthroughs Steering the Next Generation of Cancer Control.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Tumor Microenvironmental Regulation of CAR T-Cell Therapy in High Risk Medulloblastoma.Research square · 2026Article
- Mathematical modeling of immune counter-regulation predicts efficacy of fractionated CD8Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Modulation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Dendritic Cells to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cell-drug conjugates: a novel drug delivery system for cancer therapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Advances in adoptive cell therapy for ovarian cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive T cell therapies (ACT) have revolutionized the management of hematologic malignancies; however, their efficacy in solid tumors remains limited. Accumulating evidence implicates the tumor microenvironment (TME) - a highly complex and immunosuppressive niche as a major barrier to their effectiveness. In this review, we propose that the next generation of ACT will require a fundamental shift from a reductionist focus on T cell engineering alone to an integrated approach that considers the interactions between immune cells and the TME. A comprehensive literature review identified several emerging strategies to enhance the efficacy of ACT, including reprogramming tumor vasculature, repolarizing immunosuppressive myeloid and stromal cells, leveraging oncolytic viruses to remodel antigen presentation, inducing acute sterile inflammation, and targeting the physical properties of the extracellular matrix. While many of these approaches remain in early-stage development, some have already progressed to clinical trials, indicating their potential for clinical translation. Additionally, we found that conventional therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, can be strategically integrated with ACT to improve therapeutic outcomes. These findings highlight a shift in the field toward more integrative approaches. Future advances will likely depend on reprogramming the TME to support T cell persistence and functions. Addressing these interconnected challenges will require closer collaboration between immunology, oncology, and bioengineering disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.