Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208961›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of tumor- infiltrating canine natural killer cells and candidate biomarkers from first-in-dog NK immunotherapy trials.

Aryana M Razmara, Marshall Lammers, Sean J Judge, Cyrus J Sholevar, William J Murphy, Cameron E Gaskill, William T N Culp, Alicia A Gingrich, Zachary S Morris, Robert B Rebhun and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Safety and Feasibility of InfusingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aryana M RazmaraDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Marshall LammersDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Sean J JudgeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Cyrus J SholevarDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
William J MurphyDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Cameron E GaskillDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
William T N CulpDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.
Alicia A GingrichDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Zachary S MorrisDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States.
Robert B RebhunDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.
C Titus BrownDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.
David M VailDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, United States.
Michael S KentDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, United States.
Robert J CanterDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Gene Expression Analysis of Dog Natural Killer Cells Following Immunotherapy with Molecularly Targeted Radionuclide therapy or Inhaled IL-15U01CA224166 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CANTER, ROBERT J., MORRIS, ZACHARY SCOTT · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
UC Davis Comparative Oncology Training ProgramT32CA251007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Robert J. Canter, Xinbin Chen · 2020 to 2026
$1.8M
Gene Expression Analysis of Dog Natural Killer Cells as Immunotherapy TargetR03CA252793 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CANTER, ROBERT J. · 2021 to 2022
$157k
Targeting Lung Tissue Resident NK Cells with Inhaled IL-15 and TIGIT Blockade in OsteosarcomaR03CA270854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CANTER, ROBERT J. · 2022 to 2023
$151k
Combining Radiation, Allogeneic Natural Killer Immunotherapy, and PD-L1 blockade in Dogs with Naturally-Occurring MelanomaF30CA275317 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RAZMARA, ARYANA · 2023 to 2025
$136k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA275317NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R03 CA252793NCI NIH HHS R03 CA270854NCI NIH HHS T32 CA251007NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Natural killer (NK) cells have great potential to extend the promise of cancer immunotherapy, but additional research is needed to improve their efficacy in solid cancers. Dogs develop spontaneous cancers with striking similarities to humans and can serve as a crucial link to bridge murine studies and human clinical trials to improve treatment outcomes across species and identify potential biomarkers of response. Methods: Using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), we integrated blood, tissue, and tumor samples from dog and human donors to compare NK cell gene expression and develop a canine sarcoma infiltrating NK signature. Canine tissue and tumor NK cell signatures were then used to contextualize NK cell changes in first-in-dog immunotherapy clinical trials. Results: Tumor infiltrating NK cells from both canine and human sarcomas exhibited enhanced migration with a simultaneously exhausted signature that most closely correlated transcriptionally with NK cells isolated from the liver. We also analyzed peripheral blood NK cells from dogs on first-in-dog clinical trials undergoing three distinct NK-targeting immunotherapy regimens, observing that dogs with favorable responses demonstrated increased NK proportions posttreatment. Genes upregulated in NK cells in the peripheral blood of good responders included genes associated with activated NK cells and revealed post-treatment gene expression changes in the blood as a predictor of response. Discussion: Overall, NK effector functions are well adapted to their tissue of residence but dysregulated in sarcoma infiltrating NK cells despite enhanced migration. We describe NK cell trends across canine clinical trials as a platform through which we can elucidate mechanisms of response and determine novel immunotherapy strategies to improve cancer outcomes in both humans and dogs.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDog DiseasesKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingSarcomaTranscriptomeAnimalsDogsGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorcancer immunotherapycanine and human sarcomascanine sarcoma infiltrating NK signaturenatural killer (NK) cellsNK activation genesNK-targeting immunotherapy regimenssingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq)tumor infiltrating NK cells

Identifiers

PMID41208961
PMCPMC12592164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.