Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208946›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Normalization in hemophilia: conceptual foundations and clinical implications.

Kazimieras Maneikis, Evelien Krumb, Cedric Hermans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazimieras ManeikisClinic of Hematology and Oncology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Evelien KrumbDivision of Haematology, Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium.
Cedric HermansDivision of Haematology, Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in clotting factor, leading to impaired thrombin generation, bleeding complications, and long-term morbidity that severely impacts patients' quality of life. Recent advancements in treatment have significantly empowered the hemophilia community, improving disease control, reducing treatment burden, expanding access to care, and lowering the risks of lifelong complications. These advancements have continually elevated the goals of hemophilia care. The latest innovations have introduced a new ambition: the "normalization" of life for persons with hemophilia. This aspiration is both desirable and promising, with the potential to greatly enhance patients' quality of life and achieve equitable health outcomes. However, it is crucial for the entire community to first determine and define what constitutes an optimal and realistically achievable level of hemostasis normalization using current and emerging therapies. The significant psychosocial impact of hemophilia underscores the importance of targeting not only hemostasis normalization but also life normalization. This approach prioritizes reducing treatment burden and restoring mental well-being. Novel standardized tools are urgently needed to appropriately complement novel therapies, as traditional bleeding rate-based outcome metrics are becoming inadequate for assessing treatment superiority objectively. The potential risks of striving for normalized hemostasis must also be carefully considered. Moreover, specific needs and challenges associated with normalization must be addressed, particularly for carriers and women and girls with hemophilia.

Indexed as

disease burdenhemophiliahemostasisnormalizationtreatment expectations

Identifiers

PMID41208946
PMCPMC12590428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.