Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208930›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2025

Age-related differences in sepsis outcomes: A comparative analysis of elderly and very elderly ICU patients.

Ozgur Kilic, Enver Demircan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ozgur KilicOndokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Samsun, Turkey.
Enver DemircanOndokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid aging of the global population has amplified the clinical and economic burden of sepsis, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Within this demographic, the "very elderly" (≥80 years) represent a particularly vulnerable subgroup. This study evaluates and compares the outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly (65-79 years) and very elderly ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a single-center ICU, including 251 patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Patients were categorized as elderly (65-79 years, N=162) or very elderly (≥80 years, N=89). Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory results, infection sources, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Prognostic factors for mortality were analyzed using binary logistic regression. Results: The very elderly group exhibited higher rates of dementia, immobility, and fungal infections, while malignancy was more prevalent in the elderly group. ICU length of stay was longer in the very elderly group (median 8 vs. 6 days, P=0.027). ICU mortality was lower in the very elderly group, showing a trend toward significance but not reaching statistical significance (70.8% vs. 82.1%, P=0.056). Shared predictors of mortality included higher SOFA scores, malignancy, hospital-acquired sepsis, invasive mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury. Conclusion: This study highlights differences in sepsis outcomes between elderly and very elderly patients. The findings underscore the importance of developing and implementing age-specific management strategies to improve outcomes in these high-risk populations. These insights contribute to a more tailored and effective approach to geriatric critical care.

Indexed as

elderlyICU outcomesmortality predictorssepsisvery elderly

Identifiers

PMID41208930
PMCPMC12592921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.