Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208925›Full record

ReviewJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2025

Impact of protein intervention timings on critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta- analysis.

Pranav Kumar Sharma, Sanjiya Arora, Tirth Bhavsar, Mamta Kamboj, Rahul Kamboj, Varnika Gupta, Anitha Sigamani Ramamurthi, Kumari Uthayakumar, Ajay Singh, Sachin Mahendrakumar Chaudhary and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pranav Kumar SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, Somerset, Kentucky, USA.
Sanjiya AroraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tirth BhavsarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Mamta KambojDepartment of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Rahul KambojDepartment of Internal Medicine, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Varnika GuptaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial Medical College,Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anitha Sigamani RamamurthiDepartment of Internal Medicine, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kumari UthayakumarDepartment of Internal medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ajay SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sachin Mahendrakumar ChaudharyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gujarat Cancer Society Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Arghadip DasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Arianisa BajramiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Tirana,Albania.
Sumesh SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Devendra TripathiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, PA. USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients experience metabolic alterations that promote muscle atrophy and protein catabolism, increasing morbidity and mortality. While adequate protein provision is essential, the optimal timing remains controversial. Guidelines recommend higher protein targets, but evidence from randomized controlled trials is limited and inconsistent. Aim: To evaluate the effects of early versus late protein supplementation on mortality, complications, and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (January 2010-December 2022). Studies comparing early and late protein administration in adult ICU patients were included. Primary outcomes were mortality, infectious complications, overall complications, pneumonia, ICU/hospital length of stay, and mechanical ventilation duration. Results: Thirteen studies (8 RCTs, 3 retrospective, 2 prospective cohorts) involving 10,672 patients were analyzed. Mortality (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.04, p = 0.11; I Conclusion: Early protein supplementation does not significantly affect mortality or major complications but may shorten ICU stay and ventilation duration. High heterogeneity for some outcomes warrants cautious interpretation.

Indexed as

critical care nutritionICU outcomesmeta-analysisprotein supplementationtiming of nutritional support

Identifiers

PMID41208925
PMCPMC12592978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.