ReviewDigital health
Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven technologies for managing pediatric speech and language therapy: A scoping review.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Despite the high demand for speech and language therapy (SLT) for children with speech sound disorders (SSDs), accessible services remain limited. Technology-driven efforts have led to the development of systems and applications to assist children, parents, and therapists in the SLT process. AI and machine learning (ML), particularly through automatic speech recognition and audio processing techniques, play a central role in these advancements. This scoping review examines studies focusing on these techniques for managing the SLT process. Methods: To include the most relevant studies, a systematic search was conducted on 3 February 2025 across five major databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore), following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews guidelines. After applying our criteria, 30 of the 188 identified studies met the eligibility requirements. Results: These studies predominantly utilize deep neural networks, ML classifiers, acoustic features, and audio processing techniques to detect SSDs. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of these applications to support therapists in diagnostics. Moreover, computer-based tools have proven more engaging for children than traditional therapy by offering personalized therapy plans and real-time feedback. These systems enable therapists to monitor progress and adjust treatments. Conclusion: This review provides an overview of AI-assisted SLT models, highlights gaps, and suggests directions for future research. It shows the effectiveness and potential of AI in enhancing the SLT process. However, challenges related to data privacy, accessibility, and the need for clinical validation persist and need to be addressed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.