ArticleDigital health
Research on upper limb motor function evaluation and rehabilitation training system of stroke patients based on artificial intelligence: A usability and feasibility study from therapist and patient perspectives.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Balance and Mobility Impairment in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease Before and After Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Upper limb dysfunction is a prevalent challenge post-stroke, necessitating innovative rehabilitation approaches. This pilot study evaluated the usability and feasibility of a novel multimodal virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation system that integrates an automated functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity (FTHUE) assessment with personalized, task-oriented training in a clinical setting. Methods: The single-center, parallel-group pilot trial was conducted at the Rehabilitation Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Ninety-eight individuals were screened, from which 15 occupational therapists (mean clinical experience: 3.87 ± 4.84 years) and 15 stroke patients with mild upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer assessment score: 56.00 ± 5.25) were recruited. The intervention (a 1-hour hands-on VR session) was consistent across all participant groups, which incorporated neuroplasticity-based principles to deliver integrated sensorimotor training and multisensory feedback. Usability was evaluated using the system usability scale (SUS) and a custom-designed questionnaire. Results: All recruited participants completed the evaluation and were included in the analysis. Both groups exceeded the established usability threshold (SUS > 68). Therapists achieved a mean SUS score of 72.00 ± 6.69 (33% scoring ≥ 70) and patients scored 73.00 ± 7.69 (47% scoring ≥ 70). On the custom questionnaire (max 50), therapists scored 20.20 ± 2.74 and patients 19.20 ± 1.26. Therapists rated training enjoyment highest, exceptionally .superior to conventional therapy"u(4.47/5), while patients most valued ease of operation (4.20/5). No adverse events occurred during the trial. Conclusions: The VR system demonstrated good usability and was well-accepted by therapists and patients. Integrating automated assessment with personalized training shows promise as a complement to conventional rehabilitation. These findings, while promising, require confirmation in a larger definitive trial. Future work should optimize adaptive difficulty mechanisms and explore implementation in community and home settings. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center, ChiCTR2200060214. Registered May 22, 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid = 170137.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.