Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208915›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Research on upper limb motor function evaluation and rehabilitation training system of stroke patients based on artificial intelligence: A usability and feasibility study from therapist and patient perspectives.

Qiurong Xie, Qi Zhang, Yanxin Zhang, Bo Sheng, Xiaoling Wang, Jia Luo, Jia Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiurong XieCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0033-2163
Qi ZhangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Yanxin ZhangDepartment of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bo ShengSchool of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoling WangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Jia LuoCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Jia HuangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0365-9164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Upper limb dysfunction is a prevalent challenge post-stroke, necessitating innovative rehabilitation approaches. This pilot study evaluated the usability and feasibility of a novel multimodal virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation system that integrates an automated functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity (FTHUE) assessment with personalized, task-oriented training in a clinical setting. Methods: The single-center, parallel-group pilot trial was conducted at the Rehabilitation Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Ninety-eight individuals were screened, from which 15 occupational therapists (mean clinical experience: 3.87 ± 4.84 years) and 15 stroke patients with mild upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer assessment score: 56.00 ± 5.25) were recruited. The intervention (a 1-hour hands-on VR session) was consistent across all participant groups, which incorporated neuroplasticity-based principles to deliver integrated sensorimotor training and multisensory feedback. Usability was evaluated using the system usability scale (SUS) and a custom-designed questionnaire. Results: All recruited participants completed the evaluation and were included in the analysis. Both groups exceeded the established usability threshold (SUS > 68). Therapists achieved a mean SUS score of 72.00 ± 6.69 (33% scoring ≥ 70) and patients scored 73.00 ± 7.69 (47% scoring ≥ 70). On the custom questionnaire (max 50), therapists scored 20.20 ± 2.74 and patients 19.20 ± 1.26. Therapists rated training enjoyment highest, exceptionally .superior to conventional therapy"u(4.47/5), while patients most valued ease of operation (4.20/5). No adverse events occurred during the trial. Conclusions: The VR system demonstrated good usability and was well-accepted by therapists and patients. Integrating automated assessment with personalized training shows promise as a complement to conventional rehabilitation. These findings, while promising, require confirmation in a larger definitive trial. Future work should optimize adaptive difficulty mechanisms and explore implementation in community and home settings. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center, ChiCTR2200060214. Registered May 22, 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid = 170137.

Indexed as

strokeupper limbusability evaluationVirtual reality rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41208915
PMCPMC12592675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.