ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
The role of artificial intelligence and mobile health in diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- Remote exercise assessment in pulmonary hypertension.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence, extended reality and computational modelling in cross-sectional cardiovascular imaging in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Advancing the science and care of pulmonary hypertension, globally.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Personalized Medicine in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Death Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive disorder characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and ultimately right ventricular failure. Despite therapeutic advances, delayed diagnosis and imprecise risk stratification remain key challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer opportunities across the care continuum. This includes early detection from electronic health records, electrocardiography and imaging, automated, standardized interpretation of echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) potentially expediting referral and final diagnosis. Deep learning applied to echocardiography achieves expert-level PAH classification and provides automated right-heart quantification while CT/CMR-based models segment the heart and great vessels, quantify lung disease radiomics, and infer hemodynamics, supporting noninvasive triage and prognostication. In future, remote monitoring with wearables and telemedicine, coupled with AI analytics, promises to enable proactive management and potentially reduce hospitalizations. While early studies are promising, translation to practice requires rigorous external validation, prospective studies, bias auditing and seamless integration into guideline-aligned workflows. Overall, AI stands to augment expert clinical judgement by converting high-dimensional, multimodal data into actionable insights. With careful governance and evidence generation, AI has the potential to shorten time-to-diagnosis, refine risk stratification, and personalize therapy in PAH, ultimately improving outcomes for this high-risk population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.