ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Aligning with regulatory agencies for the use of digital health technologies in drug development: a case study from Parkinson's disease.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Clinical Trial Operations: A Narrative Review and Site-Level Governance Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The future digital outpatient clinic for movement disorders: from technological innovation to ethical and systemic implementation-a position paper.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Evolution of disease modifying therapy clinical trial design and therapeutic endpoints for Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) have been under investigation for many years as innovative tools for Parkinson's disease motor symptoms given their inherent high-frequency, sensitive, and objective measurement properties. DHTs used in drug development, can be defined as Drug Development Tools (DDT), though some DHTs may also be categorized as medical devices. The recent rapid increase in use of DHTs in clinical trials has been accompanied by a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, resulting in a challenging environment for widespread implementation of DHTs in applications that will provide clear impact on pharmaceutical company drug development pipelines. Parkinson's disease represents a disease of escalating burden with high unmet need for therapies that are disease modifying. Early intervention is a key area of focus, yet the heterogeneity of symptoms and lack of biomarkers poses challenges for drug development. Furthermore, the technologies and device platforms, both hardware and software, are rapidly evolving, and the companies developing the underlying devices frequently have objectives and timelines that may not align with those of the pharmaceutical industry. DHTs therefore have a unique set of challenges in terms of devising meaningful measures, standardization of data collected, responding to evolving regulatory expectations, and ensuring alignment across stakeholders. There is a growing need for new models of collaboration to bring together diverse stakeholders required to achieve regulatory endorsement of DHTs for use as DDTs. Collaborations between stakeholders working on DHTs need to be firmly anchored in the regulatory ecosystem as many regulatory challenges in DHTs have parallels in other technologies. Furthermore, there is an especially urgent need to define the pre-competitive space in which DHT data can be shared, data collection standards devised, and novel analysis approaches that are robust to residual variability developed. Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium's (CPP) Digital Drug Development Tool (3DT) initiative is highlighted as a case example to illustrate how pre-competitive public private partnerships can advance the regulatory maturity of digital health technology measures for use in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.