ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025
Anaesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation Procedures.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Effect of Pulsed Field Ablation System and Post-Ablation Mapping on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- High-frequency low-tidal-volume ventilation reduces loop catheter displacement during pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Energy Sources for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Procedural Implementation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal technology used in catheter ablation procedures. Despite its growing clinical adoption, a standardised sedation protocol has not yet been established. Well-coordinated anaesthesia management is essential for procedural success, patient safety and comfort. This review examines various sedation strategies, highlighting their respective benefits and risks, and offers practical recommendations to optimise anaesthesia management during PFA procedures. PFA enables selective myocardial ablation while preserving surrounding structures such as the oesophagus and phrenic nerve. However, inadequate sedation may lead to complications such as haemodynamic instability or airway issues. This article provides an overview of sedation protocols, monitoring strategies and anaesthetic challenges to enhance the safety and efficiency of PFA procedures. Proper anaesthesia planning plays a crucial role in ensuring the safe and successful execution of PFA and contributes to the development of standardised protocols in cardiac electrophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.