ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025
Complexity and Perplexity of Pulsed Field Ablation: An Engineering Perspective.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Transient phrenic nerve stunning during superior vena cava isolation after focal pulsed field ablation.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility of pulsed field ablation in the coronary venous system using a linear multielectrode catheter: a preclinical study in a swine model.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- A Review of Potential Complications of Pulsed Field Ablation for AF: Beneath the Surface.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA), recently introduced as a non-thermal and selective method for cardiac ablation, was associated with great promise, hope and expectation, but also raised some concerns and left some questions unanswered, in particular with respect to waveform. To better understand the challenges associated with the design and development of safe and efficient PFA systems, the underlying mechanism of electroporation at the membrane, cellular and tissue levels is described. The three interdependent components of each system, that is, the waveform, the catheter and the generator, are then addressed. The effect of the different waveform parameters on treatment outcomes is reviewed, and the consequences of a potential mismatch of the three components in the development of a safe and efficient PFA system are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.