Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208718›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Multifaceted Assessment of Amazonian Tree Diversity Reveals Pervasive Impacts of Human Modification.

Erika Berenguer, Cássio Alencar Nunes, Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez, Joice Ferreira, Yadvinder Malhi, Luiz E O C Aragão, Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert, Axa E S Figueiredo, Joseph E Hawes, Carlos A Joly and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Erika BerenguerLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8157-8792
Cássio Alencar NunesLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-0210
Jesús Aguirre-GutiérrezEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-3229
Joice FerreiraEmbrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Brazil.
Yadvinder MalhiEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Luiz E O C AragãoEarth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Adriane Esquivel-MuelbertDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Axa E S FigueiredoCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Joseph E HawesInstitute of Science and Environment, University of Cumbria, Ambleside, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-2018
Carlos A JolyDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Carlos A QuesadaCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Marina M M de SeixasEmbrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Brazil.
Ima VieiraMuseu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Jos BarlowLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-2594

Funding

BNP Paribas Foundation for Climate and Biodiversity InitiativeConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 443849/2024-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 574008/2008-0Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.469205/2019-00Darwin Initiative 17-023DEFRA's Global Centre on Biodiversity for Climate programmeEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária SEG:02.08.06.005.00Leverhulme Trust RPG-2024-342Natural Environment Research Council NE/F01614X/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/G000816/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/K016431/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/S01084X/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/T011084/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/X015262/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/X019039/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/Z504191/1Nature ConservancyRoyal Society RG\R1\251370São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP Biota Project ECOFOR) 12/51872-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropical forests harbour the majority of tree species on the planet but are increasingly subjected to deforestation and human-driven disturbances. Understanding how human modifications impact various facets of diversity-i.e., taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic-is crucial, as their responses can differ significantly. Additionally, the influence of species dominance and individual size class on the recovery trajectories of future forests is often overlooked. Here, we address these knowledge gaps by comparing the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversities of large (≥ 10 cm DBH) and small (≤ 2 cm DBH < 10 cm DBH) trees in undisturbed and human-modified Amazonian forests, considering different weights of species dominance using Hill Numbers. We sampled 25,313 large and 30,070 small trees across 215 forest plots distributed in two different regions of Eastern Amazonia and representing a range of human modification (i.e., undisturbed, logged, logged-and-burned, and secondary forests). Our findings indicate that human modifications significantly reduce the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversities of both large and small trees, regardless of dominance weightings. Secondary forests exhibited the lowest alpha-diversity and were the most dissimilar to undisturbed forests, while logged-and-burned forests were as distinct from undisturbed forests as they were from secondary forests across all diversity facets. Taxonomic and functional diversity showed similar sensitivity to human modification, while phylogenetic diversity was the least sensitive in alpha-diversity but equally sensitive in community composition analyses. Overall, we showed that human modification explained 55% of the effect size variation found in alpha-diversity and 42% of that found in community composition, with diversity facet, tree size and dominance weighting explaining either ≤ 5%. Given the deleterious impacts of human modification on the diversity of tropical forests, it is imperative to protect remaining undisturbed areas from selective logging and wildfires. Nevertheless, even disturbed primary forests still harbour more taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity than secondary forests.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesForestsTreesBrazilHumansPhylogenyRainforestAmazonbiodiversitydegradationdominancefirehill numbershuman‐modified‐tropical forestsloggingsecondary foreststrees

Identifiers

PMID41208718
PMCPMC12598522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.