ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Understanding age and sex differentials in cancer incidence and mortality: An international population-based study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic alterations in pediatric tumors: clinical relevance and translational insights.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Age and sex differences in the global cancer burden.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Understanding age and sex differentials in cancer incidence and mortality: An international population-based study.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- HALP score outperforms systemic inflammatory biomarkers for prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Observational
- Ischemic Heart Disease and the Epidemiologic Transition: Progress without Reduction in Global Burden.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most epidemiologic analyses of male-to-female (M:F) ratios for cancer incidence have done so to gain aetiological understanding, focusing on age-standardized M:F rate ratios for specific cancer sites. None have quantified the extent and timing, with respect to age, of sex differentials in the total cancer burden (all sites excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). In the present study, using data from IARC's Cancer Incidence in Five Continents for 2013-17 (N = 60 countries) and GLOBOCAN mortality 2022 (N = 69), we estimated ages when the sex ratios peaked and reversed from a male to a female excess, or vice versa. Across all countries included, a common 4-period pattern was observed. For incidence, period 1 featured an early-life male excess up to age 21 years (region-specific means ranged from 18- to 24), followed by a period 2 multi-fold female excess lasting until age 59 (56-65) and peaking at a F:M of 2.4:1 (2.0-2.9) at age 41 (39-47), then period 3 with a large male excess peaking at M:F of 1.5:1 (1.2-1.6) at 73 (69-85) years. For the absolute burden alone (not rates) countries with long life expectancies experienced a 4th period of a female excess of cancers/cancer deaths at ≥85 years. These patterns were also present for mortality, but with a shorter period 2 duration. In summary, this study characterizes the four age periods of alternating sex differentials in the cancer burden, providing essential information to support sex-appropriate allocation of cancer prevention and oncology resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.