Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208362›Full record

ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025

Screening Tool Improves Recognition of Movement Disorders by Internists and Paediatricians in Patients With Inherited Metabolic Diseases.

Ellen M Hulshof, Hugo P Lantinga, Gonnie Alkemade, Annet M Bosch, Marion M Brands, Danique Draaisma-van Vliet, Andrea B Haijer-Schreuder, Eva M M Hoytema van Konijnenburg, Mirian C H Janssen, Melanie M van der Klauw and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ellen M HulshofDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Hugo P LantingaDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gonnie AlkemadeDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Annet M BoschDepartment of Paediatric Metabolic Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marion M BrandsDepartment of Paediatric Metabolic Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Danique Draaisma-van VlietDepartment of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Andrea B Haijer-SchreuderDepartment of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eva M M Hoytema van KonijnenburgDepartment of Metabolic Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mirian C H JanssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Melanie M van der KlauwDepartment of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Mirjam LangeveldDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte M A LuboutDepartment of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-440X
Sonja L van OckenburgDepartment of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Esmeralda OussorenDepartment of Paediatrics, Centre for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-6835
Bianca PanisDepartment of Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Barbara SjoukeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Maaike de VriesDepartment of Paediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4316-5481
Margreet A E M WagenmakersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark WijnenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Deborah A SivalExpertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marina A J TijssenDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Tom J de KoningExpertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5609-1309
Lisette H KoensDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-4225

Funding

United for Metabolic Diseases UMD-CG-2022-031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement disorders are common in inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and significantly impact quality of life. Unfortunately, they are often underrecognised by metabolic physicians. This study investigated whether a new screening tool improves recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients by non-neurologists. Internists and paediatricians specialized in IMDs assessed videos of 44 IMD patients who perform four specific neurological tests, to evaluate the presence and phenotype of a movement disorder. Initially, baseline assessments were performed without the tool. Eight months later, the same videos were assessed using an instructional video demonstrating the four neurological tests, and a screening tool including these tests with 14 yes/no questions regarding observed abnormalities. One hundred and forty-nine assessments were conducted by 15 metabolic internists and paediatricians. At baseline, 70% (105/149) of assessments correctly determined the presence of a movement disorder. Sensitivity of the tool was 68%. In the second measurement, when the outcome of the tool was considered decisive (with at least one positive answer indicating a movement disorder), 79% (117/149) of assessments were correct. Sensitivity of the tool increased to 87% (Chi-square = 15.75, p < 0.001). All severe and moderately severe movement disorders were recognized in the second measurement. The tool and instructional video did not enhance recognition of specific movement disorder phenotypes. However, the tool did improve the accuracy of treatment indications (chi-square = 4.000, p < 0.05). The correct use of the screening tool significantly increased the sensitivity and thereby the recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients, though referral to a neurologist remains necessary for phenotype identification.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMetabolic DiseasesMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsMovement DisordersPediatriciansAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationPhenotypeSensitivity and Specificityadultsinherited metabolic diseasesmovement disordersscreening tool

Identifiers

PMID41208362
PMCPMC12598379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.