ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Screening Tool Improves Recognition of Movement Disorders by Internists and Paediatricians in Patients With Inherited Metabolic Diseases.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening Tool Improves Recognition of Movement Disorders by Internists and Paediatricians in Patients With Inherited Metabolic Diseases.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Movement disorders are common in inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and significantly impact quality of life. Unfortunately, they are often underrecognised by metabolic physicians. This study investigated whether a new screening tool improves recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients by non-neurologists. Internists and paediatricians specialized in IMDs assessed videos of 44 IMD patients who perform four specific neurological tests, to evaluate the presence and phenotype of a movement disorder. Initially, baseline assessments were performed without the tool. Eight months later, the same videos were assessed using an instructional video demonstrating the four neurological tests, and a screening tool including these tests with 14 yes/no questions regarding observed abnormalities. One hundred and forty-nine assessments were conducted by 15 metabolic internists and paediatricians. At baseline, 70% (105/149) of assessments correctly determined the presence of a movement disorder. Sensitivity of the tool was 68%. In the second measurement, when the outcome of the tool was considered decisive (with at least one positive answer indicating a movement disorder), 79% (117/149) of assessments were correct. Sensitivity of the tool increased to 87% (Chi-square = 15.75, p < 0.001). All severe and moderately severe movement disorders were recognized in the second measurement. The tool and instructional video did not enhance recognition of specific movement disorder phenotypes. However, the tool did improve the accuracy of treatment indications (chi-square = 4.000, p < 0.05). The correct use of the screening tool significantly increased the sensitivity and thereby the recognition of movement disorders in IMD patients, though referral to a neurologist remains necessary for phenotype identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.