ArticleANZ journal of surgery2026
Academic Competencies in Academic Global Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Academic Competencies in Academic Global Surgery: A Scoping Review.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal Surgery addresses inequalities in surgical care. As the field grows, academic programs have developed to train professionals needed to tackle systemic challenges. However, little synthesis exists about the competencies taught. This scoping review aimed to synthesize competencies taught in academic global surgery programs and present educational frameworks used.
methodsThis scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map competencies taught in academic global surgery programs between 2000 and 2024. Peer-reviewed studies and multiple data sources in English were systematically searched, screened, and analyzed thematically and descriptively.
resultsOut of 6077 records screened, 77 data sources describing academic global surgery programs met inclusion criteria. The most common qualification offered was a fellowship, followed by Master's degrees, short courses, and undergraduate modules. Programs most frequently emphasized competencies in equity, research, systems strengthening, and leadership, with additional focus on interdisciplinary collaboration, ethics, and policy. The vast majority of programs were based in the Region of the Americas (North America), particularly in high-income countries. Educational frameworks varied widely, including institution-specific models, global health standards (e.g., Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)), and competency-based approaches. Most programs were delivered in-person, though hybrid and online formats were also present.
conclusionsOur review highlights the diversity and inadequate standardization of existing academic global surgery programs, with a strong emphasis on equity, systems, and leadership competencies. Standardizing core competencies and expanding programs beyond high-income regions may strengthen academic global surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.