Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208323›Full record

ReviewChemical senses2025

Taste receptors and their ecological niches: cats, dogs, and other vertebrates.

Peihua Jiang, Gary K Beauchamp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peihua JiangMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6705-8248
Gary K BeauchampMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Funding

NIH HHS 75N93023D00001-0-759302400001-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species of animals rely on their chemical senses to detect tastants and odorants to guide dietary selection, avoid danger, and modulate social interactions, all of which ultimately enhance survival and fitness. Significant progress has been made in our understanding of the 2 major chemosensory systems, taste and smell, through studies in model organisms such as flies and mice, ranging from receptor identification to sensory coding mechanisms. These topics have been extensively reviewed elsewhere. Here, we will instead focus on less commonly used model systems and companion animals, examining how taste receptors have been shaped by feeding ecology over the course of evolution to illustrate the concept that each species lives in its own sensory world, finely tuned to its ecological niche.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledTasteTaste BudsAnimalsCatsDogsSmellVertebratesReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledecological nicheevolutionTAS1RTAS2Rtaste receptor

Identifiers

PMID41208323
PMCPMC13370246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.