Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208304›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Maximum entropy networks show that plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associations are anti-nested and modular.

Sobia Ajaz, Nida Amin, Álvaro López-García, Henry Birt, Mariona Pajares-Murgó, Luisa Lanfranco, José L Garrido, Julio M Alcántara, Matthias C Rillig, David Johnson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sobia AjazSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1272-7714
Nida AminSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Álvaro López-GarcíaDepartment of Soil and Plant Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, 18008, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8267-3572
Henry BirtDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-6220
Mariona Pajares-MurgóDepartment of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-7609
Luisa LanfrancoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, Turin, 10125, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3961-2552
José L GarridoDepartment of Soil and Plant Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, 18008, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6859-4234
Julio M AlcántaraDepartment of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8003-7844
Matthias C RilligFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Biology, Plant Ecology, Altensteinstr. 6, Berlin, 14195, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-7853
David JohnsonLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-2525
Tancredi CarusoSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3607-9609

Funding

ERDFEuropean Joint Programme-Soils project 'Symbiotic Solutions for Healthy Agricultural Landscapes (SOIL-HEAL) 2021EJPSOILEN303FSE+ RYC2022-038499-IGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031B1266MCIN MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033MCIN MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033MCIN PGC2018-100966-B-I00 fundedResearch Ireland 20/FFP-P/8584the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X000729/1the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine DAFM project 2021EJPSOILEN303the Italian Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali Project ID170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is uncertainty in whether there is a common pattern of nestedness and modularity in plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi associations, partly because of limitations arising from the use of null models that randomly rewire the observed connections to test for non-random patterns in the network. Here, we overcome these limitations by generating null association matrices using maximum entropy network modelling, and specifically the bipartite binary configuration model (BiCM) with degree distributions as soft constraints. This was used to test the hypothesis that nestedness and modularity are prevalent in plant-AM fungi associations. In contrast to past findings, we found most plant-AM fungi associations were anti-nested and modular. This pattern was almost universal, being consistent across habitat types, multiple spatial scales, and multiple levels of plant node aggregation, from communities and species to populations. Anti-nestedness can easily emerge from modularity when network patterns are determined by the identity of the plant and AM fungal nodes. Our findings emphasize the need for experiments that test the factors that cause the observed network structure and how that structure determines the function and stability of plant-AM fungi association networks.

Indexed as

EntropyMycorrhizaePlantsSymbiosisEcosystemModels, Biologicalmaximum entropy bipartite networksmodularitynestednessnetwork structurenull modelsplant–AMF association

Identifiers

PMID41208304
PMCPMC12676088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.