Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208221›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology2026

The Effectiveness of Germany's Compulsory Forensic Addiction Treatment: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Recidivism Using Matched Groups.

Norbert Schalast, Bastian Nau, Joscha Hausam, Johannes Fuss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norbert SchalastInstitute of Forensic Psychiatry and Sex Research, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2155-5473
Bastian NauInstitute of Forensic Psychiatry and Sex Research, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-0718-9656
Joscha HausamInstitute of Forensic Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2955-0343
Johannes FussInstitute of Forensic Psychiatry and Sex Research, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders are highly prevalent among offenders and are closely associated with increased rates of recidivism. This service evaluation assessed the effectiveness of compulsory forensic treatment for offenders with substance abuse in reducing recidivism. The study compared recidivism rates of 279 offenders who received mandated treatment under Section 64 of the German Criminal Code with those of a matched control group of 274 incarcerated individuals. An additional propensity score analysis confirmed the adequacy of the case-to-case matching. Over a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, the absolute risk reduction remained stable at around 16.5%, with recidivism rates at 7 years of 63.4% in the treatment group and 80.3% in the prisoner group. These findings attest to the effectiveness of compulsory addiction treatment in reducing recidivism compared to subjects who only serve a prison sentence, even though a substantial number (48%) of patients had been returned to prison but were still included in the treatment group at follow-up (intention-to-treat-analysis). The practical implications of these findings are discussed in light of recent legislative changes affecting the application of Section 64.

Indexed as

Mandatory ProgramsPrisonersRecidivismSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity Scorecriminal offenderforensic psychiatryimprisonmentinvoluntary treatmentmatched controlsoffender treatmentrecidivismsubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID41208221
PMCPMC13110320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.