Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208180›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Efficiency Recalibrates Social-Emotional Trade-Offs Behind Partner Choice in Direct Reciprocity through Intention-Specific Neural Bases.

Rui Liao, Xintong Li, Xuqi Liu, Yu Nan, Xiaolin Zhou, Xiaoxue Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rui LiaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4022-0880
Xintong LiSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xuqi LiuShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6834-8769
Yu NanShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Xiaolin ZhouShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Xiaoxue GaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-6137

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China 31900798National Natural Science Foundation of China 32571231Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 20dz2260300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct reciprocity, in which beneficiaries return favors to benefactors, is a cornerstone of human cooperation. Previous empirical work addresses partner control-how individuals decide whether and how much to reciprocate-whereas the equally critical dimension of partner choice, deciding whom to reciprocate when aided by multiple benefactors, remains understudied. This gap is addressed by testing two determinants: social-emotional motivations and reciprocal efficiency (the efficiency of reinforcing future relational capital). Combining an interpersonal task with fMRI multivariate neural expressions and representational similarity analysis, it is demonstrated that efficiency recalibrates choices between altruistic and strategic benefactors by shifting the neural balance between distinct social-emotional concerns. When reciprocating to altruistic benefactors yielded higher efficiency, participants prioritized communal concerns (gratitude/guilt) represented in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, whereas higher efficiency for strategic benefactors led them to prioritize obligation represented in the ventral striatum. General efficiency engaged the putamen, dorsomedial prefrontal, and orbitofrontal cortices; the inferior parietal lobe integrated efficiency-driven recalibration. These findings suggest that efficiency does not merely optimize material outcomes but adaptively reweights social-emotional concerns behind reciprocal partner choices, bridging economic models of rational choice with psychological theories of social emotions, offering insights into human cooperation and related practical applications.

Indexed as

BrainChoice BehaviorEmotionsInterpersonal RelationsAdultAltruismCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansIntentionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultaffective motivesefficiencyneural basespartner choicereciprocity

Identifiers

PMID41208180
PMCPMC12849932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.