Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41208114›Full record

ArticleImmunoHorizons2025

Teaching the laboratory assessment of neutrophil chemotaxis: a simulation-based approach for undergraduate immunology.

Maurizio Costabile, Gareth Denyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ImmunoHorizons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maurizio CostabileUniversity of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-6497
Gareth DenyerSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1551-3936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils are essential cellular components of innate immunity. After injury, they migrate into tissues following chemotactic gradients to phagocytose pathogens or respond to tissue damage. This multistep process is tightly regulated, and defects at any stage can lead to increased bacterial infections. Identifying specific defects requires specialized assays, yet teaching the assessment of these functions in a laboratory setting presents challenges. At the University of South Australia, undergraduate immunology is taught to students training as laboratory medicine scientists, who must understand how to assess neutrophil function. However, demonstrating chemotaxis in the laboratory is not possible due to a lack of inverted microscopes, restricted laboratory time, and lack of patient samples with defined neutrophil defects. To address this, we developed a computer simulation replicating the under-agarose method of quantifying neutrophil chemotaxis. In the simulation, students load both "control" and "patient" samples and measure both random and directed migration toward 5 common chemoattractants. Using an in-house-defined reference range, they determine the immunological status of each sample. The simulation's impact was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach, incorporating Likert-scale questionnaires, free-text feedback, and scores from laboratory reports. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with the simulation significantly enhancing their understanding of neutrophil function. All students successfully completed the report, typically achieving high grades. These findings support the use of authentic computer-based simulations as effective alternatives for teaching complex immunological techniques in resource-limited settings, offering a practical and engaging solution to challenges in traditional laboratory instruction.

Indexed as

Allergy and ImmunologyChemotaxisChemotaxis, LeukocyteEducation, Medical, UndergraduateNeutrophilsComputer SimulationHumanschemotaxiseducationneutrophilsimulationundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41208114
PMCPMC12597877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.