ArticleImmunoHorizons2025
Teaching the laboratory assessment of neutrophil chemotaxis: a simulation-based approach for undergraduate immunology.
Article in ImmunoHorizons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-animal models in undergraduate education: opportunities, applications, and future directions.ImmunoHorizons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neutrophils are essential cellular components of innate immunity. After injury, they migrate into tissues following chemotactic gradients to phagocytose pathogens or respond to tissue damage. This multistep process is tightly regulated, and defects at any stage can lead to increased bacterial infections. Identifying specific defects requires specialized assays, yet teaching the assessment of these functions in a laboratory setting presents challenges. At the University of South Australia, undergraduate immunology is taught to students training as laboratory medicine scientists, who must understand how to assess neutrophil function. However, demonstrating chemotaxis in the laboratory is not possible due to a lack of inverted microscopes, restricted laboratory time, and lack of patient samples with defined neutrophil defects. To address this, we developed a computer simulation replicating the under-agarose method of quantifying neutrophil chemotaxis. In the simulation, students load both "control" and "patient" samples and measure both random and directed migration toward 5 common chemoattractants. Using an in-house-defined reference range, they determine the immunological status of each sample. The simulation's impact was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach, incorporating Likert-scale questionnaires, free-text feedback, and scores from laboratory reports. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with the simulation significantly enhancing their understanding of neutrophil function. All students successfully completed the report, typically achieving high grades. These findings support the use of authentic computer-based simulations as effective alternatives for teaching complex immunological techniques in resource-limited settings, offering a practical and engaging solution to challenges in traditional laboratory instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.