ArticleCurrent medical imaging2026
Diagnostic Challenges of Aortic Dissection at 5200m- A Case Report Presenting as Neck and Back Emphysema
Article in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundcute Aortic Dissection (AD) is of great concern due to its high mortality rate. The probability of young patients without underlying diseases developing acute aortic dissection is relatively low. In extreme regions such as high-altitude areas, for patients presenting with atypical chest pain, it is necessary to not only consider life-threatening diseases such as aortic dissection and acute coronary syndrome, but also to rule out the interference of emphysema in the diagnosis. This case provides experience in the diagnosis, evacuation, and treatment of aortic dissection patients in high-altitude areas. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a young man who experienced sudden neck pain at an altitude of 5200 m during defecation. The pain persisted and radiated to the back, but there were no typical symptoms of aortic dissection. However, on physical examination, the patient was found to have unequal blood pressure in both arms. After completing a CT scan, the diagnosis was confirmed as aortic dissection with subcutaneous emphysema. The patient was transferred to a hospital at a lower altitude to undergo an “aortic arch replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass.” After follow-up, the patient had a good prognosis and was able to independently perform general daily activities.
conclusionThe purpose of this case report is to raise awareness of the diagnostic interference caused by subcutaneous emphysema and to emphasize accurate diagnosis and timely intervention when encountering patients with atypical chest pain in high-altitude environments, which is expected to gain a therapeutic time window for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.