Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41207920›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2026

Cardiovascular outcomes of semaglutide and tirzepatide for patients with type 2 diabetes in clinical practice.

Nils Krüger, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Rishi J Desai, Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara, Anna R Kehoe, Kenshiro Fuse, Georg Hahn, Heribert Schunkert, Shirley V Wang

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT06659744. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06659744 completed

Emulation of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: SUSTAIN6 Trial

Ran2024Enrolled158,310Registered outcomes2Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsNew initiation of sitagliptin, New use of semaglutide injection
Open the trial in the graph
NCT07088718 completed

Prediction of the SURPASS-CVOT Cardiovascular Outcome Trial in Healthcare Claims Data

Ran2024Enrolled44,671Registered outcomes4Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular (CV) Risk, Major Adverse Cardiac Events, Type 2 DiabetesArmsDulaglutide, Tirzepatide
Open the trial in the graph
NCT07096063 completed

Comparative Effectiveness of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in Individuals at Cardiovascular Risk

Ran2024Enrolled887,132Registered outcomes24Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular (CV) Risk, Overweight, Type 2 DiabetesArmsDulaglutide, semaglutide, Sitagliptin, Tirzepatide
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nils KrügerDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. nkruger1@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3190-0462
Sebastian SchneeweissDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rishi J DesaiDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-7273
Sushama Kattinakere SreedharaDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-304X
Anna R KehoeDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenshiro FuseDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Georg HahnDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Heribert SchunkertDepartment of Cardiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-3001
Shirley V WangDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7761-7090

Funding

Randomized Cardiovascular Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT DUPLICATE)R01HL141505 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHNEEWEISS, SEBASTIAN G., WANG, SHIRLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
New approaches to safety monitoring of novel systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in clinical practice and underrepresented populationsR01AR080194 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Sebastian G. Schneeweiss · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
Deutsche Herzstiftung (German Heart Foundation) S/02/24Deutsche Herzstiftung (German Heart Foundation) SRF-HF/24NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141505NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR080194U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01-AR080194U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01-HL141505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular outcome trials of the incretin-based medicines tirzepatide and semaglutide have shown benefits in populations with varying levels of cardiovascular risk. However, without direct head-to-head comparisons, treatment decisions rely on indirect evidence from heterogeneous trial populations, leaving optimal treatment choices uncertain. Here we conducted five cohort studies to assess the effectiveness of tirzepatide and semaglutide in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk, including obesity and type 2 diabetes, enrolled in insurance programs in the USA between 2018 and 2025. First, we emulated two cardiovascular outcome trials, SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide versus sitagliptin as placebo proxy) and SURPASS-CVOT (tirzepatide versus dulaglutide), to benchmark and critically evaluate our design, data and analytic framework. Second, we assessed each drug in expanded populations reflective of patients routinely seen in clinical practice. Third, we directly compared tirzepatide versus semaglutide. Baseline confounders were balanced using propensity score matching. For the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke or all-cause mortality, benchmarking identified high agreement between the reference trials and their emulations for all individual endpoints except for all-cause mortality in SUSTAIN-6, informing subsequent analyses. In expanded populations, comparing semaglutide versus sitagliptin for the composite outcome of myocardial infarction or stroke yielded a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.91), and comparing tirzepatide versus dulaglutide for the composite outcome including mortality yielded a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.01). In the head-to-head comparison of tirzepatide versus semaglutide, the hazard ratio was 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.18). These findings support a comparable cardiovascular benefit of tirzepatide and semaglutide in clinical practice and demonstrate how rigorously designed real-world evidence can complement randomized clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06659744 , NCT07088718 , NCT07096063 .

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsTirzepatideAgedFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSitagliptin PhosphateTreatment OutcomedulaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSitagliptin PhosphateTirzepatide

Identifiers

PMID41207920
PMCPMC12823426

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.