ArticleNature medicine2026
Cardiovascular outcomes of semaglutide and tirzepatide for patients with type 2 diabetes in clinical practice.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT06659744. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Emulation of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: SUSTAIN6 Trial
Open the trial in the graphPrediction of the SURPASS-CVOT Cardiovascular Outcome Trial in Healthcare Claims Data
Open the trial in the graphComparative Effectiveness of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in Individuals at Cardiovascular Risk
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cardiovascular Outcomes With Tirzepatide Versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Comparative efficacy of tirzepatide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Tirzepatide vs. semaglutide for obesity, glycemic control, and cardiovascular outcomes: a narrative review of clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Costs of Comorbidities and Complications Associated with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective, Cohort Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Semaglutide Exposure During Pregnancy: Results from the FAERS Database.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide for Obesity: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- The cost-effectiveness of second line diabetes medication added to standard therapy in preventing type 2 diabetes related nephropathy in Germany.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Incretin-Based Therapies, Obesity-Associated Inflammation, and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk.Cells · 2026Review
- Serotonin Signaling and Vascular Reactivity in Cardiometabolic Disease and Cardiac Surgery.Cells · 2026Review
- Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes align more closely with attained dose than achieved weight loss.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Real-World vs. Randomized Trial Evidence for Incretin-Based Therapies: A Narrative Review.Journal of diabetes · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular outcomes of semaglutide and tirzepatide in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Metabolic Pathways Linking Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Tirzepatide versus dulaglutide in heart failure: another SURPASS attempt yielding a tie.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Pharmacologic Treatment of Obesity in the Context of Type 2 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy of tirzepatide for weight regain and suboptimal glycemic control following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case series of three patients with obesity-associated type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Weight trajectories after last tirzepatide or semaglutide prescription across a federated health network.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Article
- Tramadol use is associated with reduced 28-day mortality in ICU patients after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review on the Cardioprotective and Nephroprotective Effects of Semaglutide, and Its Therapeutic Efficacy and Mechanisms in Cardiorenal Syndrome.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular outcome trials of the incretin-based medicines tirzepatide and semaglutide have shown benefits in populations with varying levels of cardiovascular risk. However, without direct head-to-head comparisons, treatment decisions rely on indirect evidence from heterogeneous trial populations, leaving optimal treatment choices uncertain. Here we conducted five cohort studies to assess the effectiveness of tirzepatide and semaglutide in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk, including obesity and type 2 diabetes, enrolled in insurance programs in the USA between 2018 and 2025. First, we emulated two cardiovascular outcome trials, SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide versus sitagliptin as placebo proxy) and SURPASS-CVOT (tirzepatide versus dulaglutide), to benchmark and critically evaluate our design, data and analytic framework. Second, we assessed each drug in expanded populations reflective of patients routinely seen in clinical practice. Third, we directly compared tirzepatide versus semaglutide. Baseline confounders were balanced using propensity score matching. For the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke or all-cause mortality, benchmarking identified high agreement between the reference trials and their emulations for all individual endpoints except for all-cause mortality in SUSTAIN-6, informing subsequent analyses. In expanded populations, comparing semaglutide versus sitagliptin for the composite outcome of myocardial infarction or stroke yielded a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.91), and comparing tirzepatide versus dulaglutide for the composite outcome including mortality yielded a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.01). In the head-to-head comparison of tirzepatide versus semaglutide, the hazard ratio was 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.18). These findings support a comparable cardiovascular benefit of tirzepatide and semaglutide in clinical practice and demonstrate how rigorously designed real-world evidence can complement randomized clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06659744 , NCT07088718 , NCT07096063 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.