ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Differentiating Creatine and Phosphocreatine In Vivo Using 3 T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic approach to MR spectroscopy of the brain: Indications, protocol, metabolites, and spectral analysis in neurologic diseases.The neuroradiology journal · 2026Review
- PreclinicalMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Differentiating Creatine and Phosphocreatine In Vivo Using 3 TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeValidation and improvements to the proton MR spectroscopic measurement of creatine and phosphocreatine in vivo at 3 T.
methodsSpectral simulations were used to evaluate and explore the mitigation of LCModel fitting bias due to lineshape, signal-to-noise (SNR) and non-metabolite backgrounds with a focus on phosphocreatine and the spline regularization settings in the fitting model.
resultsAlthough phosphocreatine and creatine are visually unresolved, excellent fitting estimates are achieved in the absence of non-metabolite background using default settings. However, in the presence of non-metabolite background, bias is observed and depends on lineshape, SNR and differences in the non-metabolite background. A more flexible setting for the LCModel spline largely mitigates this bias, allowing for the confidence to use proton MRS for PCr dynamic studies.
conclusionWithout prior knowledge of the non-metabolite signal, default settings of LCModel can introduce significant bias. Modified setup for LCModel improves quantitation of phosphocreatine and reduces bias in the overall set of metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.