ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Data Stitching for Dynamic Field Monitoring With NMR Probes.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data Stitching for Dynamic Field Monitoring With NMR Probes.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo propose a new method for characterizing sequences with higher resolution or readout length than allowed by standard field monitoring approaches.
methodsOur proposed method was devised to characterize entire readout gradients by stitching multiple segment-specific dynamic field measurements obtained across a matched number of consecutive TRs corresponding to a certain segmentation of the readout gradient. The utility of our proposed stitching method for high-order dynamic field measurements was illustrated using 2D spiral sequences. It was first demonstrated at 10.5 T and then at 7 T using both simulated and experimental MRI data. At 10.5 T, two extreme spiral readout scenarios were considered where standard field monitoring did not work. Our method was then validated in humans at 7 T, where spiral sequences were employed for brain imaging. At 7 T, our method was further compared against gradient impulse response function (GIRF)-based trajectory prediction.
resultsAt 10.5 T, our stitching method outperformed the standard approach, producing plausible dynamic field measurements throughout entire readouts. At 7 T, it produced nearly identical measurements for one readout where standard field monitoring also worked; for another readout when standard field monitoring did not work, it still produced sensible field measurements, improving image reconstruction for both simulated and experimental MRI data.
conclusionOur proposed stitching method provides an effective means to characterize challenging imaging gradients using commercially available hardware and without assuming a linear gradient system, thereby having utility for many applications especially those aiming for ultrahigh-resolution MRI at ultrahigh field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.