ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2026
Comparing observed with self-reported hand hygiene adherence among bedside nurses and physicians at two hospitals in the United States.
Article in American journal of infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05261282 (Mindful Hand Hygiene to Reduce Infections Among Veterans While Enhancing Provider Well-Being), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mindful Hand Hygiene to Reduce Infections Among Veterans While Enhancing Provider Well-Being
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brief mindfulness-based intervention to improve clinician mindful behaviours and well-being at two US hospitals: a randomised controlled, mixed methods trial.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Silicosis Among Engineered Stone Workers in Ontario, Canada: A Case Series of 20 Patients.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHand hygiene is a core component of infection prevention in healthcare settings. One potential reason for lack of adherence to recommended hand hygiene practices is erroneous self-perception. We aimed to compare perceptions about hand hygiene compliance with objective data.
methodsDirect observations of hand hygiene performance by nurses and physicians during typical workflow in inpatient general medicine wards were conducted from 12 September 2022 to 27 October 2022 at two academic Veterans Affairs medical centers. Participants were surveyed regarding perceptions about their hand hygiene performance relative to recommended practices.
resultsAmong nurses, hand hygiene was performed in 1,397/3,690 (37.9%) room entry and 2,159/4,012 (53.8%) room exit opportunities (combined adherence, 46.2%). For physicians, hand hygiene was performed in 1,016/1,237 (82.1%) room entry and 1,073/1,285 (83.5%) room exit opportunities (combined adherence, 82.8%). Surveys were collected from 92/161 nurses (57.1%) and 189/294 physicians (64.3%). Nurses self-reported compliance in 95.1% of recommended situations, while physicians self-reported 91.0%.
conclusionsWe found a disconnect between actual and perceived adherence to hand hygiene recommendations among bedside nurses and physicians in inpatient general medicine wards. This disconnect may be due to social desirability, self-serving, or overestimation biases, or time pressures. Awareness of such a disconnect may help policymakers increase hand hygiene rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.