Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41207325›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

The Ankle Recovery Trial (ART): clinical outcomes and patient experience of a pragmatic multicentre RCT comparing cast with removable boot for early mobilization after ankle fracture surgical fixation.

Rachel Martin, Sharon Docherty, Vanessa Heaslip, Helen Allen, Lee W Tbaily, Christopher J Hayward, Elsa M R Marques, Anuraag Sangar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Full weight-bearing after geriatric ankle fractures-No problem?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel MartinUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole Hospital, Poole, UK.
Sharon DochertyFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Vanessa HeaslipUniversity of Salford, Salford, UK.
Helen AllenFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Lee W TbailyUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole Hospital, Poole, UK.
Christopher J HaywardExeter Clinical Trials Unit, College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.
Elsa M R MarquesMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Anuraag SangarUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole Hospital, Poole, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study compares functional outcomes and patient experience between cast immobilization and early mobilization in a removable boot after ankle fracture fixation, with early weightbearing encouraged in both groups. Methods: This pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial with qualitative component and economic evaluation was conducted across eight UK NHS hospitals. Adults with acute ankle fractures were randomized to receive a plaster cast or removable support boot two weeks post-surgery. The primary outcome was ankle function measured by the Olerud and Molander Ankle Symptom Score (OMAS) seven weeks post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included function at 12 weeks, mechanistic measures, quality of life, complications, and resource use. Subgroup analyses included fracture complexity and age. Patients' views on both treatments were collected through semi-structured telephone interviews. Results: In total, 243 participants consented to be randomized (120 cast; 123 boot), of whom 173 (71.2%) completed the primary outcome. The mean difference in OMAS at seven weeks between groups was 4.9 points favouring the boot (95% CI -1.0 to 10.7), which is below the minimal clinically important difference, and failed to detect a difference between groups. Boot participants had better dorsiflexion, particularly those with comminuted fractures, and better plantarflexion, particularly older patients. Complication rates were low, albeit higher in the boot group (cast eight/112; boot 18/117); all were minor, except one case of deep vein thrombosis in the boot group. Overall, we found low wound complication rates (7%). There were no differences for all other secondary measures. Patients expressed preference for boots at randomization, point of withdrawal from the trial, and during interviews. Conclusion: Patients managed in casts and boots had similar functional outcomes following ankle fracture fixation. Boots provided improved dorsiflexion and plantarflexion for some subgroups, but higher complication rates. Treatment modality decisions could therefore be informed by individual patient preference.

Identifiers

PMID41207325
PMCPMC12598652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.