Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206938›Full record

SynthesisThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026

Prevalence of cognitive frailty, reversible and potentially reversible cognitive frailty among older adults without dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jinwei Bian, Zi Chen, Ying Gao, Fung Yee Lau, Daniel Yee Tak Fong, Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Pui Hing Chau

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of multidomain lifestyle intervention on dynamics of cognitive frailty: post hoc analysis of the FINGER trial.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinwei BianSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5849-2196
Zi ChenSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ying GaoSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Fung Yee LauSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Daniel Yee Tak FongSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Edmond Pui Hang ChoiSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-3540
Pui Hing ChauSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-8020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCognitive frailty (CF) is characterized by the coexistence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment, while potentially reversible cognitive frailty (PRCF) and reversible cognitive frailty (RCF) refer to two related conditions that may be modifiable or responsive to interventions. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of CF, PRCF, and RCF among older adults without dementia.

methodsA search of six literature databases was conducted from inception to August 15, 2024. Cohort and cross-sectional studies reporting CF, PRCF, or RCF prevalence in older adults aged 60+ without dementia were included. Random-effects meta-analyses with logit-transformed prevalence were performed, along with subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

resultsOf the 13,100 articles identified, 90 studies from 17 countries were eligible, with 63 studies on CF, 50 studies on PRCF, and 10 studies on RCF. In community settings, the pooled prevalence of CF and PRCF was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4%-6%) and 17% (95% CI: 13%-21%), respectively; in hospitals, 13% (95% CI: 8%-20%) and 32% (95% CI: 23%-42%); and in nursing homes, 22% (95% CI: 17%-29%) and 32% (95% CI: 1%-99%). The pooled prevalence of RCF in community settings was 21% (95% CI: 15%-29%). Studies with older participants showed higher CF prevalence. Moreover, studies with suboptimal sample sizes reported higher PRCF prevalence. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of CF, PRCF, and RCF among older adults varies across settings, with PRCF and RCF showing notable rates. Further studies in underrepresented regions, along with age-stratified analyses, prior sample size calculations, and appropriate assessment tool selection, are needed.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionFrail ElderlyFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrevalenceAging populationCognitive impairmentPhysical frailty

Identifiers

PMID41206938
PMCPMC12771507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.