Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206900›Full record

Observational studyJAMA2026

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Prediction of First Coronary Events.

Göran Bergström, Gunnar Engström, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Jonas S O Andersson, Therese Andersson, Carl-Johan Carlhäll, Kerstin Cederlund, David Erlinge, Erika Fagman and 22 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. As the picture gets prettier the bar must rise higher.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Validating clinical risk scores in contemporary populations using CCTA.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Göran BergströmDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Gunnar EngströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Elias BjörnsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Martin AdielsSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jonas S O AnderssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Skellefteå Research Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Therese AnderssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Carl-Johan CarlhällDepartment of Clinical Physiology in Linköping and Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kerstin CederlundDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
David ErlingeDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Erika FagmanDepartment of Radiology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elin GoodCMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anders GummessonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emil HagströmDepartment of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan JamesDepartment of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Magnus JanzonDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ioannis KatsoularisDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jeanette KuhlDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik LöfmarkDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna MarkstadDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jonas OldgrenDepartment of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Viktor OskarssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Piteå Research Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ellen OstenfeldDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Anders PerssonCMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Adrian PisteaDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Annika RosengrenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jonas SpaakDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan SundströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan SöderbergDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Erik ThunströmDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carl Johan ÖstgrenCMIV (Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Lars LindDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tomas JernbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Risk stratification strategies in primary prevention of coronary events lack precision. Objective: To determine whether prediction of first coronary events is improved by adding information on coronary atherosclerosis from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to a model using the pooled cohort equation (PCE) risk score tool and the coronary artery calcification score (CACS). Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational cohort study including individuals aged 50 to 64 years randomly recruited from the general population and examined at 6 university hospitals in Sweden from 2013 to 2018, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years. A sample of 30 154 individuals underwent cardiopulmonary imaging, physical examinations, routine laboratory tests, questionnaires, and/or functional tests. This study included 24 791 individuals without previous cardiovascular disease for whom high-quality CCTA images were available. Events were followed up via registers until September 2024. Exposures: The information used from the CCTA images was the extent of coronary atherosclerosis (segment involvement score), presence of noncalcified atherosclerosis, and presence of coronary obstructive disease (stenosis ≥50%). Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was a composite of first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease. Results: During follow-up, 304 coronary events occurred. Segment involvement scores of 3 to 4 and greater than 4 and presence of noncalcified atherosclerosis were associated with hazard ratios of 2.71 (95% CI, 1.34-5.44), 5.27 (95% CI, 2.50-11.07), and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.23-2.22), respectively. In a model based on the PCE and CACS, CCTA-derived data improved risk discrimination (C statistic improved from 0.764 to 0.779; P = .004) and risk reclassification (net reclassification improvement of 0.133 [95% CI, 0.031-0.165]), conferred a net correct upward reclassification of 14.2% in those with events and incorrectly classified 1.6% of participants not experiencing an event into a higher-risk category. Because of the low event rate in the cohort, reclassification mainly occurred in the group classified as at low risk (<5%) according to the PCE. Conclusions and Relevance: Information on coronary atherosclerosis from CCTA modestly improved risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors and CACS in identifying individuals at risk of coronary events and in need of primary prevention.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisMyocardial InfarctionCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSwedenVascular Calcification

Identifiers

PMID41206900
PMCPMC12598578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.