Observational studyJAMA2026
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Prediction of First Coronary Events.
Observational study in JAMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary plaque beyond calcium: advancing precision risk assessment in South Asians.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Coronary Plaque Burden in South Asian Adults: Insights From the DILWALE Registry.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis and Experimental Validation of Key Genes Associated With Hypoxia and Ischemia in Myocardial Infarction.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Adolescent intelligence and imaging-detected atherosclerosis in middle age: a population study of Swedish men.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- As the picture gets prettier the bar must rise higher.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of Heart Failure From Routine Cardiac CT Using Radiomic Phenotyping of Epicardial Fat.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Advanced Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging in Patients at Very High Cardiovascular Risk Without a Previous Cardiovascular Event: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Association Between Parameters of Penile Doppler Ultrasound and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Validating clinical risk scores in contemporary populations using CCTA.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Circulating type I collagen pro-α1 chain is inversely associated with the presence of coronary atherosclerosis in a Swedish middle-aged population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Serum syndecan-1 correlates with coronary artery calcification severity and intradialytic hypotension in elderly hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Risk stratification strategies in primary prevention of coronary events lack precision. Objective: To determine whether prediction of first coronary events is improved by adding information on coronary atherosclerosis from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to a model using the pooled cohort equation (PCE) risk score tool and the coronary artery calcification score (CACS). Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational cohort study including individuals aged 50 to 64 years randomly recruited from the general population and examined at 6 university hospitals in Sweden from 2013 to 2018, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years. A sample of 30 154 individuals underwent cardiopulmonary imaging, physical examinations, routine laboratory tests, questionnaires, and/or functional tests. This study included 24 791 individuals without previous cardiovascular disease for whom high-quality CCTA images were available. Events were followed up via registers until September 2024. Exposures: The information used from the CCTA images was the extent of coronary atherosclerosis (segment involvement score), presence of noncalcified atherosclerosis, and presence of coronary obstructive disease (stenosis ≥50%). Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was a composite of first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease. Results: During follow-up, 304 coronary events occurred. Segment involvement scores of 3 to 4 and greater than 4 and presence of noncalcified atherosclerosis were associated with hazard ratios of 2.71 (95% CI, 1.34-5.44), 5.27 (95% CI, 2.50-11.07), and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.23-2.22), respectively. In a model based on the PCE and CACS, CCTA-derived data improved risk discrimination (C statistic improved from 0.764 to 0.779; P = .004) and risk reclassification (net reclassification improvement of 0.133 [95% CI, 0.031-0.165]), conferred a net correct upward reclassification of 14.2% in those with events and incorrectly classified 1.6% of participants not experiencing an event into a higher-risk category. Because of the low event rate in the cohort, reclassification mainly occurred in the group classified as at low risk (<5%) according to the PCE. Conclusions and Relevance: Information on coronary atherosclerosis from CCTA modestly improved risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors and CACS in identifying individuals at risk of coronary events and in need of primary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.