ArticleInsights into imaging2025
AI-assisted differentiation of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease from colonization: a multi-center study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based differentiation of non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease and pulmonary tuberculosis using chest CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDifferentiating between nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) and colonization (NTM-PC) is clinically important but difficult. It remains unknown whether artificial intelligence utilizing clinical data and chest CT images could address this clinical problem. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients were retrospectively recruited with NTM isolation from respiratory specimens in two hospitals. Their disease or colonization status was determined by three NTM experts. We developed a multimodal deep learning model named NTMNet, which integrates chest CT scans and clinical data (including age, sex, acid-fast smear [AFS] results, and mycobacterial species) to predict NTM disease status. The performance of NTMNet was evaluated on both internal and external test sets.
resultsA total of 324 NTM-PC patients and 285 NTM-PD patients were included. Among the internal and external test sets, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting NTM disease status using CT imaging was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75-0.83), respectively. When imaging data were integrated with clinical information, our NTMNet model achieved AUC values of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.93) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89), respectively. Furthermore, our NTMNet model demonstrated comparable accuracy to that of three experienced pulmonologists in determining NTM disease status in the reader study.
conclusionOur multimodal NTMNet exhibited satisfactory performance in distinguishing disease status among patients with respiratory NTM isolates. This deep learning-based model has the potential to assist physicians in clinical management, achieving diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of pulmonologists. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A deep learning model leveraging chest computed tomography images and clinical data effectively differentiated NTM disease status, achieving a classification accuracy comparable to that of pulmonologists and demonstrating its potential to support accurate NTM diagnosis in clinical settings. KEY POINTS: Accurately distinguishing nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease status is clinically important but challenging. The NTMNet model effectively differentiated the NTM disease status and matched the performance of the pulmonologists. The NTMNet model could be a potential diagnostic tool for patients with respiratory NTM isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.