Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206819›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

Plasma NfL and GFAP in the preclinical stages of neurodegenerative diseases: insights from the UK Biobank.

Jolanda Buonocore, Enrico Fratto, Fulvia Arcuri, Basilio Vescio, Camilla Calomino, Mariagrazia Talarico, Costanza Maria Cristiani, Aldo Quattrone, Andrea Quattrone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jolanda BuonocoreInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Enrico FrattoInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Fulvia ArcuriNeuroscience Research Center, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Basilio VescioNeuroscience Research Center, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Camilla CalominoNeuroscience Research Center, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Mariagrazia TalaricoLaboratory of Stem Cells, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Costanza Maria CristianiNeuroscience Research Center, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Aldo QuattroneNeuroscience Research Center, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Andrea QuattroneInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy. an.quattrone@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-2083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are promising blood-based biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury and astrocytic activation, relevant in neurodegeneration. We investigated their pre-diagnostic profiles across common neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD), atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

methodsForty-eight thousand five hundred and twenty-four UK Biobank participants with baseline plasma proteomic data for NfL and GFAP were included. Incident diagnoses of PD, APD, AD, and ALS were identified through ICD-10-coded health records, after careful inclusion/exclusion procedures. Baseline plasma NfL and GFAP concentrations were standardized as z-scores adjusted for relevant covariates. The hazard ratio (HR) for incident neurodegenerative diseases was estimated using Cox regression models adjusted for demographic, clinical, socioeconomic and genetic factors.

resultsThe final sample included 1196 cases (505 PD, 26 APD, 476 AD, 189 ALS) and 44,107 control subjects. In Cox regression models, NfL was associated with higher risk of incident ALS (HR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.58-1.80, p < 0.001), APD (HR 1.51; 95% CI, 1.22-1.87, p < 0.001), AD (HR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41, p < 0.001), and PD (HR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23, p < 0.001). GFAP was independently associated with incident AD only (HR 1.72; 95% CI, 1.63-1.82, p < 0.001).

conclusionPlasma NfL and GFAP showed distinct pre-diagnostic profiles. NfL was associated with incident diagnosis of several neurodegenerative diseases, while GFAP was specific to AD, reinforcing its role in dementia. These results may help optimize the identification of target populations at risk of neurodegenerative diseases for future neuroprotective treatments.

Indexed as

Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurofilament ProteinsProdromal SymptomsAgedAlzheimer DiseaseAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBiological Specimen BanksBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUK BiobankUnited KingdomBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsGlial fibrillary acidic proteinNeurodegenerative diseasesNeurofilament light chainPlasma biomarkersUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID41206819
PMCPMC12597848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.