Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206729›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2026

Remittances, political economy and public health expenditure: evidence from Africa.

Lwanga Elizabeth Nanziri, Judith Kabajulizi, Paul Tema Gbahabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lwanga Elizabeth NanziriUniversity of Stellenbosch Business School, Belpark Campus, Carl Cronje Drive, Cape Town 7353, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-7243
Judith KabajuliziSchool of Economics, Finance and Accounting Faculty of Business and Law, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6548-5510
Paul Tema GbahaboUniversity of Stellenbosch Business School, Belpark Campus, Carl Cronje Drive, Cape Town 7353, South Africa.

Funding

British Academy NA20\100002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article revisits the argument that in the absence of good governance, remittance inflows cause the government to renege on the provision of social services and crowd out public finance where private substitutes exist. Using a quantile approach on a sample of African countries for the period 1990-2022, and after controlling for the endogeneity of remittances, the results show a positive contribution of remittances to public health expenditure, which tis annihilated into a non-linear crowd-out of public health expenditure across quantiles in the presence of varied political regimes. This relationship does not change even in the presence of a health shock. The crowd-out of public health expenditure points to an indirect effect of remittances through household consumption, private investment and tax revenue.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresPoliticsPublic HealthAfricaHumansCOVID-19F20governanceH2health expendituremigrant remittancesO23political economytax revenue

Identifiers

PMID41206729
PMCPMC12906753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.