ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Bacterial communities of wild bee species and the western honey bee (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea): Alpine insights.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild bees are decreasing in species diversity and populations due to human impact. The abundance of the western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) experiences an inverse trend, enhancing competition with wild bees and the probability of microbiome exchange. Addressing this exchange, we studied the gut microbiome composition of wild and honey bees, focusing on patterns indicating honey bee influence. Three solitary wild bee species (large scabious mining bee [Andrena hattorfiana F.], grey-backed mining bee (Andrena vaga Panzer), and European orchard bee [Osmia cornuta Latreille]) as well as bumble bees as representatives of eusocial wild bees (Bombus spp. Latreille) and honey bees were sampled in the Austrian Alps. Subsequent 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing revealed the composition of the bacterial communities. The bee groups differed concerning their bacterial composition, with honey bees having the least variation among individuals and a low number of exclusive bacterial taxa and bumble bees the highest bacterial diversity. High honey bee densities corresponded with lower bacterial diversity in wild bees and a higher bacterial similarity between wild and honey bees. Some bacterial taxa were found for the first time in the studied bee groups. Furthermore, the composition of bacterial communities differed between solitary and social bees. We found the first hints that high honey bee density negatively impacts wild bees through alterations of wild bee microbiomes. Future studies should focus on understanding microbiome transmission mechanisms and their consequences for wild bees. Suggestions on how to consider wild bee fitness are indispensable in halting the biodiversity crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.