ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Potential use of vibrational playbacks for management of pear psylla.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrated pest management programs often use pesticides alongside behavioral tactics, such as mating disruption, to manage pests. Pest management using biotremology, the study of vibrations produced by organisms, is gaining attention but requires substantial knowledge of pests and their environment. Here, we built on previous characterizations of vibrational mating signals in pear psylla to assess if pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola Förster) communication behavior can be exploited for pest management. Specifically, we conducted greenhouse experiments to test the efficacy of 3 vibrational playback treatments for mating disruption: (i) control, (ii) white noise, and (iii) male mating signals, using 2 delivery methods: (i) plant substrate and (ii) trellis wire; these 2 methods assessed whether devices attached directly to pear saplings or trellis wire supporting saplings provided similar results. We also conducted experiments in pear orchards to assess effectiveness of vibrational playbacks as trap supplements. In the greenhouse, white noise and male mating signals delivered through plant substrates reduced pear psylla offspring in 1 of 3 experiments, but never when delivered through trellis wires. Sticky traps in orchards supplemented with vibrational signals trapped more adults and females than sticky traps alone. The results of this study suggest that pear psylla vibrational communication may be exploited for pest control and pest monitoring, but variable efficacy among experiments suggests a need for further examination into delivery methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.