Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206707›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025

Potential use of vibrational playbacks for management of pear psylla.

Dowen Mae I Jocson, Louis B Nottingham, Tobin D Northfield, Elizabeth H Beers, Liesl Oeller, David W Crowder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dowen Mae I JocsonDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6956-8732
Louis B NottinghamTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2558-6418
Tobin D NorthfieldTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, USA.
Elizabeth H BeersTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4917-9518
Liesl OellerDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3894-2880
David W CrowderDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-1581

Funding

Fresh and Processed Pear Research CommissionWashington State Commission of Pesticide Registration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated pest management programs often use pesticides alongside behavioral tactics, such as mating disruption, to manage pests. Pest management using biotremology, the study of vibrations produced by organisms, is gaining attention but requires substantial knowledge of pests and their environment. Here, we built on previous characterizations of vibrational mating signals in pear psylla to assess if pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola Förster) communication behavior can be exploited for pest management. Specifically, we conducted greenhouse experiments to test the efficacy of 3 vibrational playback treatments for mating disruption: (i) control, (ii) white noise, and (iii) male mating signals, using 2 delivery methods: (i) plant substrate and (ii) trellis wire; these 2 methods assessed whether devices attached directly to pear saplings or trellis wire supporting saplings provided similar results. We also conducted experiments in pear orchards to assess effectiveness of vibrational playbacks as trap supplements. In the greenhouse, white noise and male mating signals delivered through plant substrates reduced pear psylla offspring in 1 of 3 experiments, but never when delivered through trellis wires. Sticky traps in orchards supplemented with vibrational signals trapped more adults and females than sticky traps alone. The results of this study suggest that pear psylla vibrational communication may be exploited for pest control and pest monitoring, but variable efficacy among experiments suggests a need for further examination into delivery methods.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationHemipteraInsect ControlSexual Behavior, AnimalVibrationAnimalsFemaleMalePyrusacousticsbiotremologymating disruptionpestvibrational communication

Identifiers

PMID41206707
PMCPMC12596723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.